From: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: airlied@linux.ie
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: fix check order in radeon_bo_move
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:49:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a16cc4d6-4a23-eb91-7d44-cf3ccac88db4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201125143424.1434-1-christian.koenig@amd.com>
Ping, Dave this is another fix for the Multihop patch set.
Without it radeon is completely broken on drm-misc-next.
Thanks,
Christian.
Am 25.11.20 um 15:34 schrieb Christian König:
> Reorder the code to fix checking if blitting is available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c | 54 +++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
> index 0ca381b95d3d..2b598141225f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
> @@ -216,27 +216,15 @@ static int radeon_bo_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
> struct ttm_resource *old_mem = &bo->mem;
> int r;
>
> - if ((old_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM &&
> - new_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM) ||
> - (old_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM &&
> - new_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM)) {
> - hop->fpfn = 0;
> - hop->lpfn = 0;
> - hop->mem_type = TTM_PL_TT;
> - hop->flags = 0;
> - return -EMULTIHOP;
> - }
> -
> if (new_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_TT) {
> r = radeon_ttm_tt_bind(bo->bdev, bo->ttm, new_mem);
> if (r)
> return r;
> }
> - radeon_bo_move_notify(bo, evict, new_mem);
>
> r = ttm_bo_wait_ctx(bo, ctx);
> if (r)
> - goto fail;
> + return r;
>
> /* Can't move a pinned BO */
> rbo = container_of(bo, struct radeon_bo, tbo);
> @@ -246,12 +234,12 @@ static int radeon_bo_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
> rdev = radeon_get_rdev(bo->bdev);
> if (old_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM && bo->ttm == NULL) {
> ttm_bo_move_null(bo, new_mem);
> - return 0;
> + goto out;
> }
> if (old_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM &&
> new_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_TT) {
> ttm_bo_move_null(bo, new_mem);
> - return 0;
> + goto out;
> }
>
> if (old_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_TT &&
> @@ -259,31 +247,37 @@ static int radeon_bo_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
> radeon_ttm_tt_unbind(bo->bdev, bo->ttm);
> ttm_resource_free(bo, &bo->mem);
> ttm_bo_assign_mem(bo, new_mem);
> - return 0;
> + goto out;
> }
> - if (!rdev->ring[radeon_copy_ring_index(rdev)].ready ||
> - rdev->asic->copy.copy == NULL) {
> - /* use memcpy */
> - goto memcpy;
> + if (rdev->ring[radeon_copy_ring_index(rdev)].ready &&
> + rdev->asic->copy.copy != NULL) {
> + if ((old_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM &&
> + new_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM) ||
> + (old_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM &&
> + new_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM)) {
> + hop->fpfn = 0;
> + hop->lpfn = 0;
> + hop->mem_type = TTM_PL_TT;
> + hop->flags = 0;
> + return -EMULTIHOP;
> + }
> +
> + r = radeon_move_blit(bo, evict, new_mem, old_mem);
> + } else {
> + r = -ENODEV;
> }
>
> - r = radeon_move_blit(bo, evict, new_mem, old_mem);
> if (r) {
> -memcpy:
> r = ttm_bo_move_memcpy(bo, ctx, new_mem);
> - if (r) {
> - goto fail;
> - }
> + if (r)
> + return r;
> }
>
> +out:
> /* update statistics */
> atomic64_add((u64)bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT, &rdev->num_bytes_moved);
> + radeon_bo_move_notify(bo, evict, new_mem);
> return 0;
> -fail:
> - swap(*new_mem, bo->mem);
> - radeon_bo_move_notify(bo, false, new_mem);
> - swap(*new_mem, bo->mem);
> - return r;
> }
>
> static int radeon_ttm_io_mem_reserve(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_resource *mem)
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-26 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-25 14:34 [PATCH] drm/radeon: fix check order in radeon_bo_move Christian König
2020-11-26 15:49 ` Christian König [this message]
2020-11-26 16:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 8:31 ` Dave Airlie
2020-11-27 14:10 ` Christian König
2020-11-27 14:46 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-11-27 14:49 ` Christian König
2020-11-27 15:09 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a16cc4d6-4a23-eb91-7d44-cf3ccac88db4@gmail.com \
--to=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox