AMD-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: "Kuehling, Felix" <Felix.Kuehling-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
	"Koenig,
	Christian" <Christian.Koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
	"amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org"
	<amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] drm/amdgpu: fix ATC handling for Ryzen
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 20:03:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a40597e6-1f76-583b-55ad-089dcd9eeed4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba45371a-7ea9-5144-c3c9-c59f93b434d8-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>

Am 01.04.19 um 19:59 schrieb Kuehling, Felix:
> On 2019-04-01 7:23 a.m., Christian König wrote:
>> Am 30.03.19 um 01:41 schrieb Kuehling, Felix:
>>> Patches 1-3 are Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>> About the direct mode, that removes a bunch of synchronization, so it
>>> must make some assumptions about the state of the page tables. What
>>> makes that safe?
>> Direct mode is only supposed to be used during page fault handling.
>>
>> E.g. we know that the page tables are in the correct place in this
>> situation because the hardware is hammering on a PTE and waiting for
>> it to become valid.
> A fence could also indicate a concurrent modification of the page table.
> For example a PTB may be allocated and initialized concurrently, not in
> direct mode. Would direct mode need to wait for a fence that indicates
> completion of the PTB initialization? Or do we have some way to ensure
> such concurrent allocation and initialization of a PTB cannot happen?

Yeah, that is a very good question I haven't solved yet either.

My currently best idea is to separate the address space, e.g. use the 
lower address space for on demand paging and the higher with classic 
pre-filled page tables for the MM and display engines.

Christian.

>
> Regards,
>     Felix
>
>
>> Christian.
>>
>>>    Is it safe to use direct-mode on a
>>> per-page-table-update basis? Or do all page table updates have to go
>>> through direct mode to avoid hazards? If yes, then maybe this should be
>>> a property of the VM rather than a parameter that gets passed to a bunch
>>> of function calls.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>      Felix
>>>
>>> On 2019-03-29 6:45 a.m., Christian König wrote:
>>>> Otherwise we don't correctly use translate further.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>     drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>>>>     1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>>>> index 3d221f044183..059d9802e713 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>>>> @@ -767,14 +767,17 @@ static int amdgpu_vm_clear_bo(struct
>>>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>>            addr = 0;
>>>>         if (ats_entries) {
>>>> -        uint64_t ats_value;
>>>> +        uint64_t value = 0, flags;
>>>>     -        ats_value = AMDGPU_PTE_DEFAULT_ATC;
>>>> -        if (level != AMDGPU_VM_PTB)
>>>> -            ats_value |= AMDGPU_PDE_PTE;
>>>> +        flags = AMDGPU_PTE_DEFAULT_ATC;
>>>> +        if (level != AMDGPU_VM_PTB) {
>>>> +            /* Handle leaf PDEs as PTEs */
>>>> +            flags |= AMDGPU_PDE_PTE;
>>>> +            amdgpu_gmc_get_vm_pde(adev, level, &value, &flags);
>>>> +        }
>>>>                r = vm->update_funcs->update(&params, bo, addr, 0,
>>>> ats_entries,
>>>> -                         0, ats_value);
>>>> +                         value, flags);
>>>>             if (r)
>>>>                 return r;
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-01 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-29 10:45 [PATCH 1/8] drm/amdgpu: fix ATC handling for Ryzen Christian König
     [not found] ` <20190329104507.2602-1-christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-03-29 10:45   ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/amdgpu: handle leaf PDEs as PTEs on Vega Christian König
2019-03-29 10:45   ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/amdgpu: provide the page fault queue to the VM code Christian König
     [not found]     ` <20190329104507.2602-3-christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-03-29 14:23       ` Alex Deucher
     [not found]         ` <CADnq5_Mv5dVc2o5yvnFRJXLAwxuv5ysFLOLGc9OTWeiVBZAeZA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2019-03-29 14:24           ` Christian König
2019-03-29 10:45   ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/amdgpu: allow direct submission in the VM backends Christian König
2019-03-29 10:45   ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/amdgpu: allow direct submission of PDE updates Christian König
2019-03-29 10:45   ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/amdgpu: allow direct submission of PTE updates Christian König
2019-03-29 10:45   ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/amdgpu: allow direct submission of clears Christian König
2019-03-29 10:45   ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/amdgpu: add graceful VM fault handling Christian König
2019-03-30  0:41   ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/amdgpu: fix ATC handling for Ryzen Kuehling, Felix
     [not found]     ` <9cd61a18-fe16-f5aa-5b61-fef6d91d143b-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-01 11:23       ` Christian König
     [not found]         ` <7317b472-f24a-346a-7e6c-97c98b04e600-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-01 17:59           ` Kuehling, Felix
     [not found]             ` <ba45371a-7ea9-5144-c3c9-c59f93b434d8-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-01 18:03               ` Christian König [this message]
     [not found]                 ` <a40597e6-1f76-583b-55ad-089dcd9eeed4-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-01 18:58                   ` Kuehling, Felix
     [not found]                     ` <32035eda-563d-b26b-83a6-71db67c846e6-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-03 17:24                       ` Koenig, Christian
     [not found]                         ` <c2cfeddb-7217-2110-d335-824b0a22371c-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-03 21:41                           ` Kuehling, Felix

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a40597e6-1f76-583b-55ad-089dcd9eeed4@gmail.com \
    --to=ckoenig.leichtzumerken-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Christian.Koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Felix.Kuehling-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox