From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: christian.koenig@amd.com, alexander.deucher@amd.com,
felix.kuehling@amd.com, mario.limonciello@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] drm/buddy: Add defragmentation support
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 12:23:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af43196c-d926-454b-8914-c5753f5d3799@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240208155000.339325-3-Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>
On 08/02/2024 15:50, Arunpravin Paneer Selvam wrote:
> Add a function to support defragmentation.
>
> v1: Defragment the memory beginning from min_order
> till the required memory space is available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>
> Suggested-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> include/drm/drm_buddy.h | 3 ++
No users?
> 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
> index 33ad0cfbd54c..fac423d2cb73 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
> @@ -276,10 +276,12 @@ drm_get_buddy(struct drm_buddy_block *block)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_get_buddy);
>
> -static void __drm_buddy_free(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> - struct drm_buddy_block *block)
> +static unsigned int __drm_buddy_free(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> + struct drm_buddy_block *block,
> + bool defrag)
> {
> struct drm_buddy_block *parent;
> + unsigned int order;
>
> while ((parent = block->parent)) {
> struct drm_buddy_block *buddy;
> @@ -289,12 +291,14 @@ static void __drm_buddy_free(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> if (!drm_buddy_block_is_free(buddy))
> break;
>
> - if (drm_buddy_block_is_clear(block) !=
> - drm_buddy_block_is_clear(buddy))
> - break;
> + if (!defrag) {
> + if (drm_buddy_block_is_clear(block) !=
> + drm_buddy_block_is_clear(buddy))
> + break;
>
> - if (drm_buddy_block_is_clear(block))
> - mark_cleared(parent);
> + if (drm_buddy_block_is_clear(block))
> + mark_cleared(parent);
> + }
Maybe check if the two blocks are incompatible and chuck a warn if they
are not? Main thing is not to hide issues with split blocks that should
have been merged before.
>
> list_del(&buddy->link);
>
> @@ -304,8 +308,49 @@ static void __drm_buddy_free(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> block = parent;
> }
>
> + order = drm_buddy_block_order(block);
> mark_free(mm, block);
> +
> + return order;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * drm_buddy_defrag - Defragmentation routine
> + *
> + * @mm: DRM buddy manager
> + * @min_order: minimum order in the freelist to begin
> + * the defragmentation process
> + *
> + * Driver calls the defragmentation function when the
> + * requested memory allocation returns -ENOSPC.
> + */
> +void drm_buddy_defrag(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> + unsigned int min_order)
Just wondering if we need "full defag" also? We would probably need to
call this at fini() anyway.
> +{
> + struct drm_buddy_block *block;
> + struct list_head *list;
> + unsigned int order;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (min_order > mm->max_order)
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = min_order - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
Need to be careful with min_order = 0 ?
> + list = &mm->free_list[i];
> + if (list_empty(list))
> + continue;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_reverse(block, list, link) {
Don't we need the safe_reverse() variant here, since this is removing
from the list?
> + if (!block->parent)
> + continue;
> +
> + order = __drm_buddy_free(mm, block, 1);
> + if (order >= min_order)
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_buddy_defrag);
>
> /**
> * drm_buddy_free_block - free a block
> @@ -321,7 +366,7 @@ void drm_buddy_free_block(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> if (drm_buddy_block_is_clear(block))
> mm->clear_avail += drm_buddy_block_size(mm, block);
>
> - __drm_buddy_free(mm, block);
> + __drm_buddy_free(mm, block, 0);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_buddy_free_block);
>
> @@ -470,7 +515,7 @@ __alloc_range_bias(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> if (buddy &&
> (drm_buddy_block_is_free(block) &&
> drm_buddy_block_is_free(buddy)))
> - __drm_buddy_free(mm, block);
> + __drm_buddy_free(mm, block, 0);
> return ERR_PTR(err);
> }
>
> @@ -588,7 +633,7 @@ alloc_from_freelist(struct drm_buddy *mm,
>
> err_undo:
> if (tmp != order)
> - __drm_buddy_free(mm, block);
> + __drm_buddy_free(mm, block, 0);
> return ERR_PTR(err);
> }
>
> @@ -668,7 +713,7 @@ static int __alloc_range(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> if (buddy &&
> (drm_buddy_block_is_free(block) &&
> drm_buddy_block_is_free(buddy)))
> - __drm_buddy_free(mm, block);
> + __drm_buddy_free(mm, block, 0);
>
> err_free:
> if (err == -ENOSPC && total_allocated_on_err) {
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_buddy.h b/include/drm/drm_buddy.h
> index d81c596dfa38..d0f63e7b5915 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_buddy.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_buddy.h
> @@ -166,6 +166,9 @@ void drm_buddy_free_list(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> struct list_head *objects,
> unsigned int flags);
>
> +void drm_buddy_defrag(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> + unsigned int min_order);
> +
> void drm_buddy_print(struct drm_buddy *mm, struct drm_printer *p);
> void drm_buddy_block_print(struct drm_buddy *mm,
> struct drm_buddy_block *block,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-16 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-08 15:49 [PATCH v6 1/3] drm/buddy: Implement tracking clear page feature Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2024-02-08 15:49 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] drm/amdgpu: Enable clear page functionality Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2024-02-08 15:50 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] drm/buddy: Add defragmentation support Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2024-02-16 12:23 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2024-02-16 12:33 ` Christian König
2024-02-16 13:21 ` Matthew Auld
2024-02-16 14:02 ` Christian König
2024-02-16 14:47 ` Matthew Auld
2024-02-16 15:08 ` Christian König
2024-02-16 11:49 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] drm/buddy: Implement tracking clear page feature Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2024-02-16 12:03 ` Matthew Auld
2024-02-21 12:23 ` Paneer Selvam, Arunpravin
2024-02-21 12:40 ` Paneer Selvam, Arunpravin
2024-02-21 17:54 ` Matthew Auld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af43196c-d926-454b-8914-c5753f5d3799@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=felix.kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox