From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Yaroslav <iam@0la.ch>, "Yaroslav Bolyukin" <iam@lach.pw>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "Harry Wentland" <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
"Leo Li" <sunpeng.li@amd.com>,
"Rodrigo Siqueira" <siqueira@igalia.com>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Wayne Lin" <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] drm/edid: prepare for VESA vendor-specific data block extension
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 16:47:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afb3d6b3788ad3f8ece48399be7e8e195a62b8b6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2f847ef3-9fb9-46a1-b5bd-38d8498b7772@0la.ch>
On Wed, 26 Nov 2025, Yaroslav <iam@0la.ch> wrote:
> On 2025-11-26 15:29, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Nov 2025, Yaroslav <iam@0la.ch> wrote:
>> The failure mode is: Someone buys a new shiny laptop with eDP MSO, with
>> bigger vendor block, and won't get a picture on screen.
>
> I understand that, I'm only confused because this does seem to be as
> suitable for backport as this fixed DSC bpp thing is:
>
> Someone buys a VR headset with fixed DSC bpp (Bigscreen Beyond/Bigscreen
> Beyond 2/Vive Pro 2), and the system is unable to detect them.
>
> Unless eDP MSO with vendor specific data block extended with unset fixed
> DSC bpp value is much more popular in the wild, that is. I have however
> failed to discover any devices which have this value present other than
> the three mentioned VR headsets.
The difference is between an existing and enabled feature working vs. a
new feature working. eDP MSO is expected to work. Also, IIUC you can
still use the VR headsets albeit with a lower resolution. For eDP MSO
you simply get nothing, and even beginning to debug the issue is
problematic, since that is quite possibly the only display on the
device.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-26 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-26 6:51 [PATCH v6 0/7] VESA DisplayID spec allows the device to force its DSC bits per pixel value Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26 6:51 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] drm/edid: rename VESA block parsing functions to more generic name Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26 9:05 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 6:51 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] drm/edid: prepare for VESA vendor-specific data block extension Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26 9:13 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 14:08 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 14:50 ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 14:59 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 15:06 ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 15:26 ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 16:32 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 14:20 ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 14:29 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 14:41 ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 14:47 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-11-26 14:53 ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 6:51 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] drm/edid: MSO should only be used for non-eDP displays Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26 14:10 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 14:22 ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 6:51 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] drm/edid: parse DSC DPP passthru support flag for mode VII timings Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26 14:19 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 14:35 ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 14:52 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 6:51 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] drm/edid: for consistency, use mask everywhere for block rev parsing Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26 14:20 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 6:51 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] drm/edid: parse DRM VESA dsc bpp target Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26 14:25 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 6:51 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] drm/amd: use fixed dsc bits-per-pixel from edid Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26 7:13 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] VESA DisplayID spec allows the device to force its DSC bits per pixel value Yaroslav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afb3d6b3788ad3f8ece48399be7e8e195a62b8b6@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Wayne.Lin@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
--cc=iam@0la.ch \
--cc=iam@lach.pw \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=siqueira@igalia.com \
--cc=sunpeng.li@amd.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox