From: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] drm/syncobj: remove drm_syncobj_cb and cleanup
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 11:00:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b671e977-d201-c381-1d28-d79a92591ac7@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181204115948.15202-4-christian.koenig@amd.com>
Hi Daniel,
can I get a review for this one? It is essentially just a follow up
cleanup on one of your patches and shouldn't have any functional effect.
Thanks,
Christian.
Am 04.12.18 um 12:59 schrieb Christian König:
> This completes "drm/syncobj: Drop add/remove_callback from driver
> interface" and cleans up the implementation a bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c | 91 ++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> include/drm/drm_syncobj.h | 21 ----------
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
> index db30a0e89db8..e19525af0cce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,16 @@
> #include "drm_internal.h"
> #include <drm/drm_syncobj.h>
>
> +struct syncobj_wait_entry {
> + struct list_head node;
> + struct task_struct *task;
> + struct dma_fence *fence;
> + struct dma_fence_cb fence_cb;
> +};
> +
> +static void syncobj_wait_syncobj_func(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj,
> + struct syncobj_wait_entry *wait);
> +
> /**
> * drm_syncobj_find - lookup and reference a sync object.
> * @file_private: drm file private pointer
> @@ -82,58 +92,33 @@ struct drm_syncobj *drm_syncobj_find(struct drm_file *file_private,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_syncobj_find);
>
> -static void drm_syncobj_add_callback_locked(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj,
> - struct drm_syncobj_cb *cb,
> - drm_syncobj_func_t func)
> +static void drm_syncobj_fence_add_wait(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj,
> + struct syncobj_wait_entry *wait)
> {
> - cb->func = func;
> - list_add_tail(&cb->node, &syncobj->cb_list);
> -}
> -
> -static int drm_syncobj_fence_get_or_add_callback(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj,
> - struct dma_fence **fence,
> - struct drm_syncobj_cb *cb,
> - drm_syncobj_func_t func)
> -{
> - int ret;
> -
> - *fence = drm_syncobj_fence_get(syncobj);
> - if (*fence)
> - return 1;
> + if (wait->fence)
> + return;
>
> spin_lock(&syncobj->lock);
> /* We've already tried once to get a fence and failed. Now that we
> * have the lock, try one more time just to be sure we don't add a
> * callback when a fence has already been set.
> */
> - if (syncobj->fence) {
> - *fence = dma_fence_get(rcu_dereference_protected(syncobj->fence,
> - lockdep_is_held(&syncobj->lock)));
> - ret = 1;
> - } else {
> - *fence = NULL;
> - drm_syncobj_add_callback_locked(syncobj, cb, func);
> - ret = 0;
> - }
> + if (syncobj->fence)
> + wait->fence = dma_fence_get(
> + rcu_dereference_protected(syncobj->fence, 1));
> + else
> + list_add_tail(&wait->node, &syncobj->cb_list);
> spin_unlock(&syncobj->lock);
> -
> - return ret;
> }
>
> -void drm_syncobj_add_callback(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj,
> - struct drm_syncobj_cb *cb,
> - drm_syncobj_func_t func)
> +static void drm_syncobj_remove_wait(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj,
> + struct syncobj_wait_entry *wait)
> {
> - spin_lock(&syncobj->lock);
> - drm_syncobj_add_callback_locked(syncobj, cb, func);
> - spin_unlock(&syncobj->lock);
> -}
> + if (!wait->node.next)
> + return;
>
> -void drm_syncobj_remove_callback(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj,
> - struct drm_syncobj_cb *cb)
> -{
> spin_lock(&syncobj->lock);
> - list_del_init(&cb->node);
> + list_del_init(&wait->node);
> spin_unlock(&syncobj->lock);
> }
>
> @@ -148,7 +133,7 @@ void drm_syncobj_replace_fence(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj,
> struct dma_fence *fence)
> {
> struct dma_fence *old_fence;
> - struct drm_syncobj_cb *cur, *tmp;
> + struct syncobj_wait_entry *cur, *tmp;
>
> if (fence)
> dma_fence_get(fence);
> @@ -162,7 +147,7 @@ void drm_syncobj_replace_fence(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj,
> if (fence != old_fence) {
> list_for_each_entry_safe(cur, tmp, &syncobj->cb_list, node) {
> list_del_init(&cur->node);
> - cur->func(syncobj, cur);
> + syncobj_wait_syncobj_func(syncobj, cur);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -608,13 +593,6 @@ drm_syncobj_fd_to_handle_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> &args->handle);
> }
>
> -struct syncobj_wait_entry {
> - struct task_struct *task;
> - struct dma_fence *fence;
> - struct dma_fence_cb fence_cb;
> - struct drm_syncobj_cb syncobj_cb;
> -};
> -
> static void syncobj_wait_fence_func(struct dma_fence *fence,
> struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
> {
> @@ -625,11 +603,8 @@ static void syncobj_wait_fence_func(struct dma_fence *fence,
> }
>
> static void syncobj_wait_syncobj_func(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj,
> - struct drm_syncobj_cb *cb)
> + struct syncobj_wait_entry *wait)
> {
> - struct syncobj_wait_entry *wait =
> - container_of(cb, struct syncobj_wait_entry, syncobj_cb);
> -
> /* This happens inside the syncobj lock */
> wait->fence = dma_fence_get(rcu_dereference_protected(syncobj->fence,
> lockdep_is_held(&syncobj->lock)));
> @@ -688,12 +663,8 @@ static signed long drm_syncobj_array_wait_timeout(struct drm_syncobj **syncobjs,
> */
>
> if (flags & DRM_SYNCOBJ_WAIT_FLAGS_WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT) {
> - for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) {
> - drm_syncobj_fence_get_or_add_callback(syncobjs[i],
> - &entries[i].fence,
> - &entries[i].syncobj_cb,
> - syncobj_wait_syncobj_func);
> - }
> + for (i = 0; i < count; ++i)
> + drm_syncobj_fence_add_wait(syncobjs[i], &entries[i]);
> }
>
> do {
> @@ -742,9 +713,7 @@ static signed long drm_syncobj_array_wait_timeout(struct drm_syncobj **syncobjs,
>
> cleanup_entries:
> for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) {
> - if (entries[i].syncobj_cb.func)
> - drm_syncobj_remove_callback(syncobjs[i],
> - &entries[i].syncobj_cb);
> + drm_syncobj_remove_wait(syncobjs[i], &entries[i]);
> if (entries[i].fence_cb.func)
> dma_fence_remove_callback(entries[i].fence,
> &entries[i].fence_cb);
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_syncobj.h b/include/drm/drm_syncobj.h
> index b1fe921f8e8f..7c6ed845c70d 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_syncobj.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_syncobj.h
> @@ -28,8 +28,6 @@
>
> #include "linux/dma-fence.h"
>
> -struct drm_syncobj_cb;
> -
> /**
> * struct drm_syncobj - sync object.
> *
> @@ -62,25 +60,6 @@ struct drm_syncobj {
> struct file *file;
> };
>
> -typedef void (*drm_syncobj_func_t)(struct drm_syncobj *syncobj,
> - struct drm_syncobj_cb *cb);
> -
> -/**
> - * struct drm_syncobj_cb - callback for drm_syncobj_add_callback
> - * @node: used by drm_syncob_add_callback to append this struct to
> - * &drm_syncobj.cb_list
> - * @func: drm_syncobj_func_t to call
> - *
> - * This struct will be initialized by drm_syncobj_add_callback, additional
> - * data can be passed along by embedding drm_syncobj_cb in another struct.
> - * The callback will get called the next time drm_syncobj_replace_fence is
> - * called.
> - */
> -struct drm_syncobj_cb {
> - struct list_head node;
> - drm_syncobj_func_t func;
> -};
> -
> void drm_syncobj_free(struct kref *kref);
>
> /**
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-05 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-04 11:59 [PATCH 01/10] dma-buf: make fence sequence numbers 64 bit v2 Christian König
[not found] ` <20181204115948.15202-1-christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2018-12-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 02/10] dma-buf: add new dma_fence_chain container v3 Christian König
2018-12-04 12:19 ` Chunming Zhou
2018-12-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm: revert "expand replace_fence to support timeline point v2" Christian König
2018-12-04 12:20 ` Chunming Zhou
2018-12-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/syncobj: remove drm_syncobj_cb and cleanup Christian König
2018-12-04 12:29 ` Chunming Zhou
2018-12-05 10:00 ` Christian König [this message]
2018-12-07 14:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-12-07 14:23 ` Christian König
2018-12-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/syncobj: add new drm_syncobj_add_point interface v2 Christian König
2018-12-04 12:31 ` Chunming Zhou
2018-12-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/syncobj: add timeline payload query ioctl v4 Christian König
2018-12-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/syncobj: use the timeline point in drm_syncobj_find_fence v3 Christian König
2018-12-04 12:47 ` Chunming Zhou
2018-12-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/amdgpu: update version for timeline syncobj support in amdgpu Christian König
2018-12-04 12:12 ` [PATCH 01/10] dma-buf: make fence sequence numbers 64 bit v2 Chunming Zhou
2018-12-04 12:52 ` Chris Wilson
2018-12-04 12:57 ` Chris Wilson
2018-12-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/syncobj: add support for timeline point wait v7 Christian König
2018-12-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/amdgpu: add timeline support in amdgpu CS v2 Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b671e977-d201-c381-1d28-d79a92591ac7@gmail.com \
--to=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox