From: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
To: vitaly.prosyak@amd.com, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
christian.koenig@amd.com, alexander.deucher@amd.com,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sched: Check scheduler work queue before calling timeout handling
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 06:40:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b72bf526-54d1-a47a-4d61-732073d9c117@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230509214337.124382-1-vitaly.prosyak@amd.com>
On 2023-05-09 17:43, vitaly.prosyak@amd.com wrote:
> From: Vitaly Prosyak <vitaly.prosyak@amd.com>
>
> During an IGT GPU reset test we see again oops despite of
> commit 0c8c901aaaebc9bf8bf189ffc116e678f7a2dc16
> drm/sched: Check scheduler ready before calling timeout handling.
You can probably use the more succinct fixes line:
0c8c901aaaebc9 ("drm/sched: Check scheduler ready before calling timeout handling")
>
> It uses ready condition whether to call drm_sched_fault which unwind
> the TDR leads to GPU reset.
> However it looks the ready condition is overloaded with other meanings,
> for example, for the following stack is related GPU reset :
>
> 0 gfx_v9_0_cp_gfx_start
> 1 gfx_v9_0_cp_gfx_resume
> 2 gfx_v9_0_cp_resume
> 3 gfx_v9_0_hw_init
> 4 gfx_v9_0_resume
> 5 amdgpu_device_ip_resume_phase2
>
> does the following:
> /* start the ring */
> gfx_v9_0_cp_gfx_start(adev);
> ring->sched.ready = true;
>
> The same approach is for other ASICs as well :
> gfx_v8_0_cp_gfx_resume
> gfx_v10_0_kiq_resume, etc...
>
> As a result, our GPU reset test causes GPU fault which calls unconditionally gfx_v9_0_fault
> and then drm_sched_fault. However now it depends on whether the interrupt service routine
> drm_sched_fault is executed after gfx_v9_0_cp_gfx_start is completed which sets the ready
> field of the scheduler to true even for not initialized schedulers and causes oops vs
"not initialized" --> "uninitialized" reads better.
> no fault or when ISR drm_sched_fault is completed prior gfx_v9_0_cp_gfx_start and
> NULL pointer dereference does not occur.
>
> Use the field timeout_wq to prevent oops for uninitialized schedulers.
> The field could be initialized by the work queue of resetting the domain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Prosyak <vitaly.prosyak@amd.com>
Add, a fixes tag,
Fixes: 0c8c901aaaebc9 ("drm/sched: Check scheduler ready before calling timeout handling")
Before the SOB tag.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> index 649fac2e1ccb..670b7997f389 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static void drm_sched_start_timeout(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> */
> void drm_sched_fault(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> {
> - if (sched->ready)
> + if (sched->timeout_wq)
> mod_delayed_work(sched->timeout_wq, &sched->work_tdr, 0);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_fault);
Yes, this does indeed seem more correct.
Apply the comments above and repost the patch to amd-gfx and dri-devel and
I'll push it to drm-misc-fixes and amd-staging-drm-next.
--
Regards,
Luben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-10 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-09 21:43 [PATCH] drm/sched: Check scheduler work queue before calling timeout handling vitaly.prosyak
2023-05-09 21:56 ` Alex Deucher
2023-05-10 10:40 ` Luben Tuikov [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-05-10 13:51 vitaly.prosyak
2023-05-10 14:19 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-05-10 14:24 ` vitaly prosyak
2023-05-10 14:31 ` Luben Tuikov
2023-05-10 14:14 vitaly.prosyak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b72bf526-54d1-a47a-4d61-732073d9c117@amd.com \
--to=luben.tuikov@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=vitaly.prosyak@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).