Re: [Patch v2 1/2] drm/amdkfd: clean up the code to free hmm_range

["Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>]

On 10/28/25 13:13, Sunil Khatri wrote:
> a. hmm_range is either NULL or a valid pointer so we
> do not need to set range to NULL ever.
> 
> b. keep the hmm_range_free in the end irrespective of
> the other conditions to avoid some additional checks
> and also avoid double free issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c | 12 ++++--------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
> index ffb7b36e577c..fb3daa7cd326 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
> @@ -1744,11 +1744,8 @@ static int svm_range_validate_and_map(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  			else
>  				r = -ENOMEM;
>  			WRITE_ONCE(p->svms.faulting_task, NULL);
> -			if (r) {
> -				amdgpu_hmm_range_free(range);
> -				range = NULL;
> +			if (r)
>  				pr_debug("failed %d to get svm range pages\n", r);
> -			}
>  		} else {
>  			r = -EFAULT;
>  		}
> @@ -1767,14 +1764,13 @@ static int svm_range_validate_and_map(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  		 * Override return value to TRY AGAIN only if prior returns
>  		 * were successful
>  		 */
> -		if (range && !amdgpu_hmm_range_valid(range) && !r) {
> +		if (range && !amdgpu_hmm_range_valid(range) && !r ) {

Extra unnecessary space here before the ).

With that fixed Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> for this patch here and rb for #2 in the series.

Regards,
Christian.

>  			pr_debug("hmm update the range, need validate again\n");
>  			r = -EAGAIN;
>  		}
> -		/* Free the hmm range */
> -		if (range)
> -			amdgpu_hmm_range_free(range);
>  
> +		/* Free the hmm range */
> +		amdgpu_hmm_range_free(range);
>  
>  		if (!r && !list_empty(&prange->child_list)) {
>  			pr_debug("range split by unmap in parallel, validate again\n");