From: "Christian König via amd-gfx" <amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org>
To: Alex Deucher
<alexdeucher-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Christian Koenig <christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Christian König"
<ckoenig.leichtzumerken-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"amd-gfx list"
<amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org>,
"Maling list - DRI developers"
<dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org>,
"Bas Nieuwenhuizen"
<bas-dldO88ZXqoXqqjsSq9zF6IRWq/SkRNHw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/sched: Fix entities with 0 rqs.
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:08:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb86b555-c2ae-c20a-6fb9-a00a53e2ff4a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_PcSTHw48oFu1oKVKh6sQt2=6FGtz3OJAX5xPLR8D9GUA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Am 13.02.19 um 22:03 schrieb Alex Deucher via amd-gfx:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 5:43 AM Christian König
> <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Am 30.01.19 um 02:53 schrieb Bas Nieuwenhuizen:
>>> Some blocks in amdgpu can have 0 rqs.
>>>
>>> Job creation already fails with -ENOENT when entity->rq is NULL,
>>> so jobs cannot be pushed. Without a rq there is no scheduler to
>>> pop jobs, and rq selection already does the right thing with a
>>> list of length 0.
>>>
>>> So the operations we need to fix are:
>>> - Creation, do not set rq to rq_list[0] if the list can have length 0.
>>> - Do not flush any jobs when there is no rq.
>>> - On entity destruction handle the rq = NULL case.
>>> - on set_priority, do not try to change the rq if it is NULL.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
>> One minor comment on patch #2, apart from that the series is
>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>.
>>
>> I'm going to make the change on #2 and pick them up for inclusion in
>> amd-staging-drm-next.
> Hi Christian,
>
> I haven't seen these land yet. Just want to make sure they don't fall
> through the cracks.
Thanks for the reminder, I'm really having trouble catching up on
applying patches lately.
Christian.
>
> Alex
>
>> Thanks for the help,
>> Christian.
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++--------
>>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
>>> index 4463d3826ecb..8e31b6628d09 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
>>> @@ -52,12 +52,12 @@ int drm_sched_entity_init(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
>>> {
>>> int i;
>>>
>>> - if (!(entity && rq_list && num_rq_list > 0 && rq_list[0]))
>>> + if (!(entity && rq_list && (num_rq_list == 0 || rq_list[0])))
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> memset(entity, 0, sizeof(struct drm_sched_entity));
>>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entity->list);
>>> - entity->rq = rq_list[0];
>>> + entity->rq = NULL;
>>> entity->guilty = guilty;
>>> entity->num_rq_list = num_rq_list;
>>> entity->rq_list = kcalloc(num_rq_list, sizeof(struct drm_sched_rq *),
>>> @@ -67,6 +67,10 @@ int drm_sched_entity_init(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
>>>
>>> for (i = 0; i < num_rq_list; ++i)
>>> entity->rq_list[i] = rq_list[i];
>>> +
>>> + if (num_rq_list)
>>> + entity->rq = rq_list[0];
>>> +
>>> entity->last_scheduled = NULL;
>>>
>>> spin_lock_init(&entity->rq_lock);
>>> @@ -165,6 +169,9 @@ long drm_sched_entity_flush(struct drm_sched_entity *entity, long timeout)
>>> struct task_struct *last_user;
>>> long ret = timeout;
>>>
>>> + if (!entity->rq)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> sched = entity->rq->sched;
>>> /**
>>> * The client will not queue more IBs during this fini, consume existing
>>> @@ -264,20 +271,24 @@ static void drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
>>> */
>>> void drm_sched_entity_fini(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
>>> {
>>> - struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched;
>>> + struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched = NULL;
>>>
>>> - sched = entity->rq->sched;
>>> - drm_sched_rq_remove_entity(entity->rq, entity);
>>> + if (entity->rq) {
>>> + sched = entity->rq->sched;
>>> + drm_sched_rq_remove_entity(entity->rq, entity);
>>> + }
>>>
>>> /* Consumption of existing IBs wasn't completed. Forcefully
>>> * remove them here.
>>> */
>>> if (spsc_queue_peek(&entity->job_queue)) {
>>> - /* Park the kernel for a moment to make sure it isn't processing
>>> - * our enity.
>>> - */
>>> - kthread_park(sched->thread);
>>> - kthread_unpark(sched->thread);
>>> + if (sched) {
>>> + /* Park the kernel for a moment to make sure it isn't processing
>>> + * our enity.
>>> + */
>>> + kthread_park(sched->thread);
>>> + kthread_unpark(sched->thread);
>>> + }
>>> if (entity->dependency) {
>>> dma_fence_remove_callback(entity->dependency,
>>> &entity->cb);
>>> @@ -362,9 +373,11 @@ void drm_sched_entity_set_priority(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
>>> for (i = 0; i < entity->num_rq_list; ++i)
>>> drm_sched_entity_set_rq_priority(&entity->rq_list[i], priority);
>>>
>>> - drm_sched_rq_remove_entity(entity->rq, entity);
>>> - drm_sched_entity_set_rq_priority(&entity->rq, priority);
>>> - drm_sched_rq_add_entity(entity->rq, entity);
>>> + if (entity->rq) {
>>> + drm_sched_rq_remove_entity(entity->rq, entity);
>>> + drm_sched_entity_set_rq_priority(&entity->rq, priority);
>>> + drm_sched_rq_add_entity(entity->rq, entity);
>>> + }
>>>
>>> spin_unlock(&entity->rq_lock);
>>> }
>> _______________________________________________
>> amd-gfx mailing list
>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-14 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-30 1:53 [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/sched: Fix entities with 0 rqs Bas Nieuwenhuizen
[not found] ` <20190130015322.105870-1-bas-dldO88ZXqoXqqjsSq9zF6IRWq/SkRNHw@public.gmane.org>
2019-01-30 1:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/amdgpu: Only add rqs for initialized rings Bas Nieuwenhuizen
[not found] ` <20190130015322.105870-2-bas-dldO88ZXqoXqqjsSq9zF6IRWq/SkRNHw@public.gmane.org>
2019-01-30 10:42 ` Christian König
2019-01-30 1:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/amdgpu: Check if fd really is an amdgpu fd Bas Nieuwenhuizen
2019-01-30 1:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/amdgpu: Add command to override the context priority Bas Nieuwenhuizen
2019-01-30 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/sched: Fix entities with 0 rqs Christian König
[not found] ` <23f6617a-2049-11b3-b1df-07eb029db714-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2019-02-13 21:03 ` Alex Deucher via amd-gfx
[not found] ` <CADnq5_PcSTHw48oFu1oKVKh6sQt2=6FGtz3OJAX5xPLR8D9GUA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2019-02-14 9:08 ` Christian König via amd-gfx [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bb86b555-c2ae-c20a-6fb9-a00a53e2ff4a@gmail.com \
--to=amd-gfx-pd4fty7x32lngt0pjobp9y5qc8qiuhrw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=alexdeucher-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bas-dldO88ZXqoXqqjsSq9zF6IRWq/SkRNHw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox