Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] drm/amd/display: more drm_edid to AMD display driver (partial)

[Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com>]

On 31/03/2026 12:45, Leo Li wrote:
>
> On 2026-02-27 03:52, Timur Kristóf wrote:
>> On Wednesday, February 25, 2026 1:04:29 PM Central European Standard Time
>> Melissa Wen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is a reduced version of `drm/amd/display: more drm_edid to AMD
>>> display driver` [1] sent a few months ago only with the less invasive
>>> changes, i.e., those changes that don't affect DC. This partial focus on
>>> using more drm_edid helpers instead of raw EDID helpers. Most patches
>>> here are already reviewed by someone and I think they can be merged
>>> without major concerns. They can also prevent new initiatives of keeping
>>> parsing raw EDID as driver specific code, which can make harder for us
>>> to remove `drm_edid_raw()`. They should focus on moving raw EDID
>>> handling to the DRM common code instead.
>>>
>>> Regarding code changes from previous version, here I added some r-b tags
>>> (from Mario and Timur), fixed commit message syntax (Mario) and
>>> centralized error handling (Timur). I'll follow up the changes in DC to
>>> accept the Linux/DRM opaque object in a separate series since those look
>>> more sensitive.
>>>
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/amd-gfx/20251106165536.161662-1-mwen@igalia.com/
>>>
>>> BR,
>>>
>>> Melissa
>>>
>> Nice work, Melissa.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Timur Kristóf <timur.kristof@gmail.com>
>> For this series.
> Thanks for your patience Melissa, series is also
> Reviewed-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
>
> We'll include it in this week's testing.

Hi Leo,

In the end, was this series applied to AMD's branch or do I need to 
rebase it?

Melissa

>
> - Leo
>>