From: "Lazar, Lijo" <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
To: jesse.zhang@amd.com, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Alexander.Deucher@amd.com, christian.koenig@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 V8] drm/amdgpu: Optimize VM invalidation engine allocation and synchronize GPU TLB flush
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 12:49:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf70db36-141b-4d06-adeb-f71c0bd2f463@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250319050727.4099266-2-jesse.zhang@amd.com>
On 3/19/2025 10:37 AM, jesse.zhang@amd.com wrote:
> From: "Jesse.zhang@amd.com" <Jesse.zhang@amd.com>
>
> - Modify the VM invalidation engine allocation logic to handle SDMA page rings.
> SDMA page rings now share the VM invalidation engine with SDMA gfx rings instead of
> allocating a separate engine. This change ensures efficient resource management and
> avoids the issue of insufficient VM invalidation engines.
>
> - Add synchronization for GPU TLB flush operations in gmc_v9_0.c.
> Use spin_lock and spin_unlock to ensure thread safety and prevent race conditions
> during TLB flush operations. This improves the stability and reliability of the driver,
> especially in multi-threaded environments.
>
> v2: replace the sdma ring check with a function `amdgpu_sdma_is_page_queue`
> to check if a ring is an SDMA page queue.(Lijo)
>
> v3: Add GC version check, only enabled on GC9.4.3/9.4.4/9.5.0
> v4: Fix code style and add more detailed description (Christian)
> v5: Remove dependency on vm_inv_eng loop order, explicitly lookup shared inv_eng(Christian/Lijo)
> v6: Added search shared ring function amdgpu_sdma_get_shared_ring (Lijo)
>
> Suggested-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Zhang <jesse.zhang@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.c | 19 ++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.h | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.c
> index 4eefa17fa39b..26a90576792c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.c
> @@ -573,6 +573,7 @@ int amdgpu_gmc_allocate_vm_inv_eng(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> unsigned vm_inv_engs[AMDGPU_MAX_VMHUBS] = {0};
> unsigned i;
> unsigned vmhub, inv_eng;
> + struct amdgpu_ring *shared_ring;
>
> /* init the vm inv eng for all vmhubs */
> for_each_set_bit(i, adev->vmhubs_mask, AMDGPU_MAX_VMHUBS) {
> @@ -602,6 +603,24 @@ int amdgpu_gmc_allocate_vm_inv_eng(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + /* SDMA has a special packet which allows it to use the same
> + * invalidation engine for all the rings in one instance.
> + * Therefore, we do not allocate a separate VM invalidation engine
> + * for SDMA page rings. Instead, they share the VM invalidation
> + * engine with the SDMA gfx ring. This change ensures efficient
> + * resource management and avoids the issue of insufficient VM
> + * invalidation engines.
> + */
> + if (amdgpu_sdma_is_shared_inv_eng(adev, ring)) {
> + shared_ring = amdgpu_sdma_get_shared_ring(adev, ring);
> + if (shared_ring) {
> + ring->vm_inv_eng = shared_ring->vm_inv_eng;
This also has an implicit assumption that the shared_ring is already
assigned inv engine.
Ideally, it's better if a ring and its shared ring(s) are assigned the
engine in one-go.
// Skip assigning individually if it's a shared ring.
if (is_shared_ring(ring))
continue;
// Assign engine to ring
ring->vm_inv_eng = inv_eng - 1;
// Assign ring (or rings) that share the same engine
shared_ring = get_shared_ring(ring);
if (shared_ring)
shared_ring->vm_inv_eng = ring->vm_inv_eng;
Thanks,
Lijo
> + dev_info(adev->dev, "ring %s shares VM invalidation engine %u with ring %s on hub %u\n",
> + ring->name, ring->vm_inv_eng, shared_ring->name, ring->vm_hub);
> + continue;
> + }
> + }
> +
> ring->vm_inv_eng = inv_eng - 1;
> vm_inv_engs[vmhub] &= ~(1 << ring->vm_inv_eng);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.c
> index 39669f8788a7..6287159dab62 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.c
> @@ -504,6 +504,37 @@ void amdgpu_sdma_sysfs_reset_mask_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> }
> }
>
> +struct amdgpu_ring *amdgpu_sdma_get_shared_ring(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
> +{
> + if (adev->sdma.has_page_queue && ring == &adev->sdma.instance[ring->me].page)
> + return &adev->sdma.instance[ring->me].ring;
> + else
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> +* amdgpu_sdma_is_shared_inv_eng - Check if a ring is an SDMA ring that shares a VM invalidation engine
> +* @adev: Pointer to the AMDGPU device structure
> +* @ring: Pointer to the ring structure to check
> +*
> +* This function checks if the given ring is an SDMA ring that shares a VM invalidation engine.
> +* It returns true if the ring is such an SDMA ring, false otherwise.
> +*/
> +bool amdgpu_sdma_is_shared_inv_eng(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
> +{
> + int i = ring->me;
> +
> + if (!adev->sdma.has_page_queue || i >= adev->sdma.num_instances)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (amdgpu_ip_version(adev, GC_HWIP, 0) == IP_VERSION(9, 4, 3) ||
> + amdgpu_ip_version(adev, GC_HWIP, 0) == IP_VERSION(9, 4, 4) ||
> + amdgpu_ip_version(adev, GC_HWIP, 0) == IP_VERSION(9, 5, 0))
> + return (ring == &adev->sdma.instance[i].page);
> + else
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * amdgpu_sdma_register_on_reset_callbacks - Register SDMA reset callbacks
> * @funcs: Pointer to the callback structure containing pre_reset and post_reset functions
> @@ -545,7 +576,7 @@ int amdgpu_sdma_reset_engine(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t instance_id, b
> {
> struct sdma_on_reset_funcs *funcs;
> int ret = 0;
> - struct amdgpu_sdma_instance *sdma_instance = &adev->sdma.instance[instance_id];;
> + struct amdgpu_sdma_instance *sdma_instance = &adev->sdma.instance[instance_id];
> struct amdgpu_ring *gfx_ring = &sdma_instance->ring;
> struct amdgpu_ring *page_ring = &sdma_instance->page;
> bool gfx_sched_stopped = false, page_sched_stopped = false;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.h
> index 965169320065..77288bfb4e76 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sdma.h
> @@ -194,4 +194,7 @@ int amdgpu_sdma_ras_sw_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> void amdgpu_debugfs_sdma_sched_mask_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> int amdgpu_sdma_sysfs_reset_mask_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> void amdgpu_sdma_sysfs_reset_mask_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> +bool amdgpu_sdma_is_shared_inv_eng(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_ring *ring);
> +struct amdgpu_ring *amdgpu_sdma_get_shared_ring(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> + struct amdgpu_ring *ring);
> #endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-19 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-19 5:07 [PATCH 1/3 v8] drm/amd/amdgpu: Increase max rings to enable SDMA page ring jesse.zhang
2025-03-19 5:07 ` [PATCH 2/3 V8] drm/amdgpu: Optimize VM invalidation engine allocation and synchronize GPU TLB flush jesse.zhang
2025-03-19 7:19 ` Lazar, Lijo [this message]
2025-03-19 5:07 ` [PATCH 3/3 V8] drm/amdgpu/sdma_v4_4_2: update VM flush implementation for SDMA jesse.zhang
2025-03-19 7:13 ` Lazar, Lijo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bf70db36-141b-4d06-adeb-f71c0bd2f463@amd.com \
--to=lijo.lazar@amd.com \
--cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=jesse.zhang@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox