From: "Borah, Chaitanya Kumar" <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
To: Alex Hung <alex.hung@amd.com>, Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com>,
<airlied@gmail.com>, <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
<christian.koenig@amd.com>, <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
<maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, <mripard@kernel.org>,
<simona@ffwll.ch>, <siqueira@igalia.com>, <sunpeng.li@amd.com>,
<tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>,
Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>,
Xaver Hugl <xaver.hugl@kde.org>, <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<kernel-dev@igalia.com>, Rob Clark <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Dmitry Baryshkov" <lumag@kernel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@linux.dev>,
Jessica Zhang <jesszhan0024@gmail.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
"Marijn Suijten" <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/atomic: track individual colorop updates
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 11:21:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dbb27ec4-cdc6-4ead-9daf-664d97e86cd0@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <70d47573-a0cb-4f65-8838-1956f8a672fa@amd.com>
On 3/26/2026 8:38 AM, Alex Hung wrote:
>
>
> On 3/25/26 20:13, Melissa Wen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 25/03/2026 06:08, Borah, Chaitanya Kumar wrote:
>>> Hi Melissa,
>>>
>>> On 3/23/2026 6:45 PM, Melissa Wen wrote:
>>>> As we do for CRTC color mgmt properties, use color_mgmt_changed flag to
>>>> track any value changes in the color pipeline of a given plane, so that
>>>> drivers can update color blocks as soon as plane color pipeline or
>>>> individual colorop values change.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> #v1
>>>> Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> v2: add linux types to provide bool for MSM driver (kernel bot)
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> +-------
>>>> include/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.h | 4 ++-
>>>> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/
>>>> drm_atomic_uapi.c
>>>> index 87de41fb4459..713fa9e81732 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
>>>> @@ -265,13 +265,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_set_fb_for_plane);
>>>> *
>>>> * Helper function to select the color pipeline on a plane by setting
>>>> * it to the first drm_colorop element of the pipeline.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Return: true if plane color pipeline value changed, false
>>>> otherwise.
>>>> */
>>>> -void
>>>> +bool
>>>> drm_atomic_set_colorop_for_plane(struct drm_plane_state *plane_state,
>>>> struct drm_colorop *colorop)
>>>> {
>>>> struct drm_plane *plane = plane_state->plane;
>>>> + /* Color pipeline didn't change */
>>>> + if (plane_state->color_pipeline == colorop)
>>>> + return false;
>>>> +
>>>> if (colorop)
>>>> drm_dbg_atomic(plane->dev,
>>>> "Set [COLOROP:%d] for [PLANE:%d:%s] state %p\n",
>>>> @@ -283,6 +289,8 @@ drm_atomic_set_colorop_for_plane(struct
>>>> drm_plane_state *plane_state,
>>>> plane->base.id, plane->name, plane_state);
>>>> plane_state->color_pipeline = colorop;
>>>> +
>>>> + return true;
>>>> }
>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_set_colorop_for_plane);
>>>> @@ -600,7 +608,7 @@ static int
>>>> drm_atomic_plane_set_property(struct drm_plane *plane,
>>>> if (val && !colorop)
>>>> return -EACCES;
>>>> - drm_atomic_set_colorop_for_plane(state, colorop);
>>>> + state->color_mgmt_changed |=
>>>> drm_atomic_set_colorop_for_plane(state, colorop);
>>>> } else if (property == config->prop_fb_damage_clips) {
>>>> ret = drm_property_replace_blob_from_id(dev,
>>>> &state->fb_damage_clips,
>>>> @@ -709,11 +717,11 @@ drm_atomic_plane_get_property(struct drm_plane
>>>> *plane,
>>>> static int drm_atomic_color_set_data_property(struct drm_colorop
>>>> *colorop,
>>>> struct drm_colorop_state *state,
>>>> struct drm_property *property,
>>>> - uint64_t val)
>>>> + uint64_t val,
>>>> + bool *replaced)
>>>> {
>>>> ssize_t elem_size = -1;
>>>> ssize_t size = -1;
>>>> - bool replaced = false;
>>>> switch (colorop->type) {
>>>> case DRM_COLOROP_1D_LUT:
>>>> @@ -735,28 +743,39 @@ static int
>>>> drm_atomic_color_set_data_property(struct drm_colorop *colorop,
>>>> &state->data,
>>>> val,
>>>> -1, size, elem_size,
>>>> - &replaced);
>>>> + replaced);
>>>> }
>>>> static int drm_atomic_colorop_set_property(struct drm_colorop
>>>> *colorop,
>>>> struct drm_colorop_state *state,
>>>> struct drm_file *file_priv,
>>>> struct drm_property *property,
>>>> - uint64_t val)
>>>> + uint64_t val,
>>>> + bool *replaced)
>>>> {
>>>> if (property == colorop->bypass_property) {
>>>> - state->bypass = val;
>>>> + if (state->bypass != val) {
>>>> + state->bypass = val;
>>>> + *replaced = true;
>>>> + }
>>>> } else if (property == colorop->lut1d_interpolation_property) {
>>>> colorop->lut1d_interpolation = val;
>>>> } else if (property == colorop->curve_1d_type_property) {
>>>> - state->curve_1d_type = val;
>>>> + if (state->curve_1d_type != val) {
>>>> + state->curve_1d_type = val;
>>>> + *replaced = true;
>>>> + }
>>>> } else if (property == colorop->multiplier_property) {
>>>> - state->multiplier = val;
>>>> + if (state->multiplier != val) {
>>>> + state->multiplier = val;
>>>> + *replaced = true;
>>>> + }
>>>> } else if (property == colorop->lut3d_interpolation_property) {
>>>> colorop->lut3d_interpolation = val;
>>>
>>> I think it would be prudent to add this logic for both the 1dlut and
>>> 3dlut interpolation properties. Even though they have just one value
>>> exposed right now, that might change in future.
>>
>> I didn't include interpolations in the color_mgmt_changed logic
>> because there is a comment in `include/drm/drm_colorop.h` saying that
>> they are read-only.
>> But thinking better about it, and I think we should not allow
>> `drm_atomic_colorop_set_property()` calls to change values of these
>> properties if they are read-only.
>> I didn't track the discussions about what are the plans for these
>> properties, how the userspace knows they are read-only properties and
>> shouldn't set any value?
>
> It has been a while but I don't remember that userspace needs to set
> this value, so this can be a mistake. Device driver just need to give a
> supported interpolation that best describes the hardware.
>
> We can remove setting them in drm_atomic_colorop_set_property if
> everybody agrees.
>
In that case, they need to be marked DRM_MODE_PROP_IMMUTABLE at creation.
==
Chaitanya
>>
>>>
>>>> } else if (property == colorop->data_property) {
>>>> return drm_atomic_color_set_data_property(colorop, state,
>>>> - property, val);
>>>> + property, val,
>>>> + replaced);
>>>> } else {
>>>> drm_dbg_atomic(colorop->dev,
>>>> "[COLOROP:%d:%d] unknown property [PROP:%d:%s]\n",
>>>> @@ -1273,6 +1292,8 @@ int drm_atomic_set_property(struct
>>>> drm_atomic_state *state,
>>>> case DRM_MODE_OBJECT_COLOROP: {
>>>> struct drm_colorop *colorop = obj_to_colorop(obj);
>>>> struct drm_colorop_state *colorop_state;
>>>> + struct drm_plane_state *plane_state;
>>>> + bool replaced = false;
>>>> colorop_state = drm_atomic_get_colorop_state(state,
>>>> colorop);
>>>> if (IS_ERR(colorop_state)) {
>>>> @@ -1281,7 +1302,17 @@ int drm_atomic_set_property(struct
>>>> drm_atomic_state *state,
>>>> }
>>>> ret = drm_atomic_colorop_set_property(colorop,
>>>> colorop_state,
>>>> - file_priv, prop, prop_value);
>>>> + file_priv, prop, prop_value,
>>>> + &replaced);
>>>> + if (ret || !replaced)
>>>> + break;
>>>> +
>>>> + plane_state = drm_atomic_get_plane_state(state, colorop-
>>>> >plane);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR(plane_state)) {
>>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(plane_state);
>>>> + break;
>>>> + }
>>>> + plane_state->color_mgmt_changed = true;
>>>
>>> I am not sure if it was the intention of the uapi design but as I
>>> understand there are no guardrails for setting a colorop in an
>>> "inactive" pipeline.
>>>
>>> So, color_mgmt_changed is set to true even if a colorop from a color
>>> pipeline that is not currently selected(or set to Bypass) by the
>>> user- space is changed.
>>> I guess, the driver needs to be intelligent enough to ignore those
>>> colorop but should we reject it at drm core?
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for pointing it out, makes sense!
>> I agree that drm core should reject changes in inactive pipelines.
>>
>> Melissa
>>
>>
>>> ==
>>> Chaitanya
>>>
>>>> break;
>>>> }
>>>> default:
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.h b/include/drm/
>>>> drm_atomic_uapi.h
>>>> index 436315523326..4e7e78f711e2 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.h
>>>> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
>>>> #ifndef DRM_ATOMIC_UAPI_H_
>>>> #define DRM_ATOMIC_UAPI_H_
>>>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>>>> +
>>>> struct drm_crtc_state;
>>>> struct drm_display_mode;
>>>> struct drm_property_blob;
>>>> @@ -50,7 +52,7 @@ drm_atomic_set_crtc_for_plane(struct
>>>> drm_plane_state *plane_state,
>>>> struct drm_crtc *crtc);
>>>> void drm_atomic_set_fb_for_plane(struct drm_plane_state *plane_state,
>>>> struct drm_framebuffer *fb);
>>>> -void drm_atomic_set_colorop_for_plane(struct drm_plane_state
>>>> *plane_state,
>>>> +bool drm_atomic_set_colorop_for_plane(struct drm_plane_state
>>>> *plane_state,
>>>> struct drm_colorop *colorop);
>>>> int __must_check
>>>> drm_atomic_set_crtc_for_connector(struct drm_connector_state
>>>> *conn_state,
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-26 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-23 13:15 [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/atomic: track colorop changes of a given plane Melissa Wen
2026-03-23 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/atomic: track individual colorop updates Melissa Wen
2026-03-25 9:08 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-03-26 2:13 ` Melissa Wen
2026-03-26 3:08 ` Alex Hung
2026-03-26 5:51 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar [this message]
2026-03-23 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/amd/display: use plane color_mgmt_changed to track colorop changes Melissa Wen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dbb27ec4-cdc6-4ead-9daf-664d97e86cd0@intel.com \
--to=chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com \
--cc=abhinav.kumar@linux.dev \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.hung@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=contact@emersion.fr \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
--cc=jesszhan0024@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lumag@kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=mwen@igalia.com \
--cc=robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=siqueira@igalia.com \
--cc=sunpeng.li@amd.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=xaver.hugl@kde.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox