AMD-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Liang@rtg-sunil-navi33.amd.com,
	Prike <Prike.Liang@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/userq: add mutex lock/unlocked version of amdgpu_userq_put
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 10:46:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <df195a01-e228-4f14-9e20-ecb63dc9d653@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260320094111.3640176-1-sunil.khatri@amd.com>

On 3/20/26 10:41, Sunil Khatri wrote:
> There is a possibility of deadlock when last reference to a queue is
> put in certain situations where mutex is already help when calling
> the amdgpu_userq_destroy.

As far as I can see that is illegal to begin with. Why are we doing that?

Regards,
Christian.

> So based on the thread where it could be
> locked we pass the locked information in the destroy functionality
> to avoid taking the lock again.
> 
> Cc: Liang, Prike <Prike.Liang@amd.com>
> Suggested-by: Liang, Prike <Prike.Liang@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c     | 52 +++++++++++++------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.h     |  2 +-
>  .../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq_fence.c   |  4 +-
>  3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c
> index ced9ade44be4..9482664e9c2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c
> @@ -617,13 +617,17 @@ amdgpu_userq_get_doorbell_index(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr,
>  }
>  
>  static int
> -amdgpu_userq_destroy(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr, struct amdgpu_usermode_queue *queue)
> +amdgpu_userq_destroy(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr, struct amdgpu_usermode_queue *queue,
> +		     bool locked)
>  {
>  	struct amdgpu_device *adev = uq_mgr->adev;
>  	int r = 0;
>  
> -	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&uq_mgr->resume_work);
> +	/* It safe to unlock since we are in destroy and the queue ref is only this */
> +	if (locked)
> +		mutex_unlock(&uq_mgr->userq_mutex);
>  
> +	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&uq_mgr->resume_work);
>  	/* Cancel any pending hang detection work and cleanup */
>  	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&queue->hang_detect_work);
>  
> @@ -657,13 +661,27 @@ amdgpu_userq_destroy(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr, struct amdgpu_usermode_que
>  		queue->state = AMDGPU_USERQ_STATE_HUNG;
>  	}
>  	amdgpu_userq_cleanup(queue);
> -	mutex_unlock(&uq_mgr->userq_mutex);
> +
> +	if (!locked)
> +		mutex_unlock(&uq_mgr->userq_mutex);
>  
>  	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(adev_to_drm(adev)->dev);
>  
>  	return r;
>  }
>  
> +static void amdgpu_userq_kref_destroy_locked(struct kref *kref)
> +{
> +	int r;
> +	struct amdgpu_usermode_queue *queue =
> +		container_of(kref, struct amdgpu_usermode_queue, refcount);
> +	struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr = queue->userq_mgr;
> +
> +	r = amdgpu_userq_destroy(uq_mgr, queue, true);
> +	if (r)
> +		drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Failed to destroy usermode queue %d\n", r);
> +}
> +
>  static void amdgpu_userq_kref_destroy(struct kref *kref)
>  {
>  	int r;
> @@ -671,7 +689,7 @@ static void amdgpu_userq_kref_destroy(struct kref *kref)
>  		container_of(kref, struct amdgpu_usermode_queue, refcount);
>  	struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr = queue->userq_mgr;
>  
> -	r = amdgpu_userq_destroy(uq_mgr, queue);
> +	r = amdgpu_userq_destroy(uq_mgr, queue, false);
>  	if (r)
>  		drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Failed to destroy usermode queue %d\n", r);
>  }
> @@ -689,10 +707,14 @@ struct amdgpu_usermode_queue *amdgpu_userq_get(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr,
>  	return queue;
>  }
>  
> -void amdgpu_userq_put(struct amdgpu_usermode_queue *queue)
> +void amdgpu_userq_put(struct amdgpu_usermode_queue *queue, bool locked)
>  {
> -	if (queue)
> -		kref_put(&queue->refcount, amdgpu_userq_kref_destroy);
> +	if (queue) {
> +		if (locked)
> +			kref_put(&queue->refcount, amdgpu_userq_kref_destroy_locked);
> +		else
> +			kref_put(&queue->refcount, amdgpu_userq_kref_destroy);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static int amdgpu_userq_priority_permit(struct drm_file *filp,
> @@ -978,7 +1000,7 @@ int amdgpu_userq_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>  		if (!queue)
>  			return -ENOENT;
>  
> -		amdgpu_userq_put(queue);
> +		amdgpu_userq_put(queue, false);
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1007,7 +1029,7 @@ amdgpu_userq_restore_all(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr)
>  			drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file,
>  				     "trying restore queue without va mapping\n");
>  			queue->state = AMDGPU_USERQ_STATE_INVALID_VA;
> -			amdgpu_userq_put(queue);
> +			amdgpu_userq_put(queue, true);
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -1015,7 +1037,7 @@ amdgpu_userq_restore_all(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr)
>  		if (r)
>  			ret = r;
>  
> -		amdgpu_userq_put(queue);
> +		amdgpu_userq_put(queue, true);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -1258,7 +1280,7 @@ amdgpu_userq_evict_all(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr)
>  		r = amdgpu_userq_preempt_helper(queue);
>  		if (r)
>  			ret = r;
> -		amdgpu_userq_put(queue);
> +		amdgpu_userq_put(queue, true);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -1298,17 +1320,17 @@ amdgpu_userq_wait_for_signal(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr)
>  		struct dma_fence *f = queue->last_fence;
>  
>  		if (!f || dma_fence_is_signaled(f)) {
> -			amdgpu_userq_put(queue);
> +			amdgpu_userq_put(queue, true);
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  		ret = dma_fence_wait_timeout(f, true, msecs_to_jiffies(100));
>  		if (ret <= 0) {
>  			drm_file_err(uq_mgr->file, "Timed out waiting for fence=%llu:%llu\n",
>  				     f->context, f->seqno);
> -			amdgpu_userq_put(queue);
> +			amdgpu_userq_put(queue, true);
>  			return -ETIMEDOUT;
>  		}
> -		amdgpu_userq_put(queue);
> +		amdgpu_userq_put(queue, true);
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -1366,7 +1388,7 @@ void amdgpu_userq_mgr_fini(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *userq_mgr)
>  		if (!queue)
>  			break;
>  
> -		amdgpu_userq_put(queue);
> +		amdgpu_userq_put(queue, false);
>  	}
>  
>  	xa_destroy(&userq_mgr->userq_xa);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.h
> index f0abc16d02cc..2a496e74ec6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.h
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ struct amdgpu_db_info {
>  };
>  
>  struct amdgpu_usermode_queue *amdgpu_userq_get(struct amdgpu_userq_mgr *uq_mgr, u32 qid);
> -void amdgpu_userq_put(struct amdgpu_usermode_queue *queue);
> +void amdgpu_userq_put(struct amdgpu_usermode_queue *queue, bool locked);
>  
>  int amdgpu_userq_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *filp);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq_fence.c
> index 18390d37a7e0..10e08cb6bd13 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq_fence.c
> @@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ int amdgpu_userq_signal_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>  	kfree(syncobj_handles);
>  
>  	if (queue)
> -		amdgpu_userq_put(queue);
> +		amdgpu_userq_put(queue, false);
>  
>  	return r;
>  }
> @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ amdgpu_userq_wait_return_fence_info(struct drm_file *filp,
>  		r = 0;
>  
>  put_waitq:
> -	amdgpu_userq_put(waitq);
> +	amdgpu_userq_put(waitq, false);
>  
>  free_fences:
>  	while (num_fences--)


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-20  9:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-20  9:41 [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/userq: add mutex lock/unlocked version of amdgpu_userq_put Sunil Khatri
2026-03-20  9:46 ` Christian König [this message]
2026-03-20 10:02   ` Khatri, Sunil
2026-03-20 10:13     ` Christian König
2026-03-20 10:53       ` Khatri, Sunil
2026-03-20 10:57         ` Christian König
2026-03-20 11:14           ` Khatri, Sunil
2026-03-20 12:10             ` Khatri, Sunil
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-20  9:43 Sunil Khatri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=df195a01-e228-4f14-9e20-ecb63dc9d653@amd.com \
    --to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=Liang@rtg-sunil-navi33.amd.com \
    --cc=Prike.Liang@amd.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sunil.khatri@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox