From: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
To: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>,
"Philip Yang" <Philip.Yang@amd.com>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: kent.russell@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/amdgpu: Fix double release KFD pasid
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:58:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ebac34f8-50be-82eb-85e1-c097d57f9991@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ddd80a3a-b393-41c2-c259-e4f9ec8facb5@gmail.com>
On 2022-12-13 10:57, Christian König wrote:
> Am 13.12.22 um 16:49 schrieb Philip Yang:
>> If amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_acquire_process_vm returns failed after vm is
>> converted to KFD vm and vm->pasid set to KFD pasid, KFD will not
>> take pdd->drm_file reference, as a result, drm close file handler maybe
>> called to release the KFD pasid before KFD process destroy to release
>> the same pasid and set vm->pasid to zero, this generates below WARNING
>> backtrace and NULL pointer access.
>
> Well NAK. If you fail after making the VM a compute VM the correct
> approach would be to drop this in the error handling again.
>
> Since we don't need to reallocate anything that should also never fail.
I don't understand this comment.
The fundamental issue, as I understand it, is that compute VMs don't own
their PASID. Multiple compute VMs on different GPUs share the same
PASID. Therefore, freeing the PASID when the compute VM is destroyed is
wrong. The PASID is freed by KFD when its process structure is destroyed.
Regards,
Felix
>
> Christian.
>
>>
>> For compute process, KFD manage pasid and drm close file handler should
>> not release KFD pasid to avoid double release.
>>
>> amdgpu: Failed to create process VM object
>>
>> ida_free called for id=32770 which is not allocated.
>> WARNING: CPU: 57 PID: 72542 at ../lib/idr.c:522 ida_free+0x96/0x140
>> RIP: 0010:ida_free+0x96/0x140
>> Call Trace:
>> amdgpu_pasid_free_delayed+0xe1/0x2a0 [amdgpu]
>> amdgpu_driver_postclose_kms+0x2d8/0x340 [amdgpu]
>> drm_file_free.part.13+0x216/0x270 [drm]
>> drm_close_helper.isra.14+0x60/0x70 [drm]
>> drm_release+0x6e/0xf0 [drm]
>> __fput+0xcc/0x280
>> ____fput+0xe/0x20
>> task_work_run+0x96/0xc0
>> do_exit+0x3d0/0xc10
>>
>> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
>> RIP: 0010:ida_free+0x76/0x140
>> Call Trace:
>> amdgpu_pasid_free_delayed+0xe1/0x2a0 [amdgpu]
>> amdgpu_driver_postclose_kms+0x2d8/0x340 [amdgpu]
>> drm_file_free.part.13+0x216/0x270 [drm]
>> drm_close_helper.isra.14+0x60/0x70 [drm]
>> drm_release+0x6e/0xf0 [drm]
>> __fput+0xcc/0x280
>> ____fput+0xe/0x20
>> task_work_run+0x96/0xc0
>> do_exit+0x3d0/0xc10
>>
>> Suggested-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c | 8 +++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
>> index efc0a13e9aea..bf444c3f6656 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
>> @@ -1244,8 +1244,14 @@ void amdgpu_driver_postclose_kms(struct
>> drm_device *dev,
>> amdgpu_bo_unreserve(adev->virt.csa_obj);
>> }
>> - pasid = fpriv->vm.pasid;
>> + if (fpriv->vm.is_compute_context)
>> + /* pasid managed by KFD is released when process is
>> destroyed */
>> + pasid = 0;
>> + else
>> + pasid = fpriv->vm.pasid;
>> +
>> pd = amdgpu_bo_ref(fpriv->vm.root.bo);
>> +
>> if (!WARN_ON(amdgpu_bo_reserve(pd, true))) {
>> amdgpu_vm_bo_del(adev, fpriv->prt_va);
>> amdgpu_bo_unreserve(pd);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-13 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-13 15:49 [PATCH 1/1] drm/amdgpu: Fix double release KFD pasid Philip Yang
2022-12-13 15:57 ` Christian König
2022-12-13 17:58 ` Felix Kuehling [this message]
2022-12-14 15:52 ` Philip Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ebac34f8-50be-82eb-85e1-c097d57f9991@amd.com \
--to=felix.kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=Philip.Yang@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=kent.russell@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox