From: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
To: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: alexander.deucher@amd.com, christian.koenig@amd.com, shane.xiao@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/amdgpu: remove TOPDOWN flags when allocating VRAM in large bar system"
Date: Sat, 20 May 2023 14:39:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f03a448f-1ba3-5d4a-a2a5-baba97b3ec1f@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230520092518.1993-1-Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>
Am 2023-05-20 um 05:25 schrieb Arunpravin Paneer Selvam:
> This reverts commit c105518679b6e87232874ffc989ec403bee59664.
>
> This patch disables the TOPDOWN flag for APU and few dGPU cards
> which has the VRAM size equal to the BAR size.
With resizable BARs it's not that rare.
>
> When we enable the TOPDOWN flag, we get the free blocks at
> the highest available memory region and we don't split the
> lower order blocks. This change is required to keep off
> the fragmentation related issues particularly in ASIC
> which has VRAM space <= 500MiB
If TOPDOWN has these general benefits, then would it make sense to
allocate visible memory TOPDOWN as well, on large-BAR GPUs? Without
knowing too much about the internals of the allocator, my intuition
tells me that using only one allocation strategy has a better chance of
minimizing fragmentation than mixing two allocation strategies for no
good reason.
Regards,
Felix
>
> Hence, we are reverting this patch.
>
> Gitlab issue link - https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2270
>
> Signed-off-by: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> index 2bd1a54ee866..ca5fc07faf6c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ void amdgpu_bo_placement_from_domain(struct amdgpu_bo *abo, u32 domain)
>
> if (flags & AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_CPU_ACCESS_REQUIRED)
> places[c].lpfn = visible_pfn;
> - else if (adev->gmc.real_vram_size != adev->gmc.visible_vram_size)
> + else
> places[c].flags |= TTM_PL_FLAG_TOPDOWN;
>
> if (flags & AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_CONTIGUOUS)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-20 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-20 9:25 [PATCH] Revert "drm/amdgpu: remove TOPDOWN flags when allocating VRAM in large bar system" Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2023-05-20 18:39 ` Felix Kuehling [this message]
2023-05-22 3:22 ` Xiao, Shane
2023-05-26 18:11 ` Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2023-05-29 2:35 ` Xiao, Shane
2023-05-29 6:44 ` Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2023-05-23 18:56 ` Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2023-06-01 14:40 ` Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f03a448f-1ba3-5d4a-a2a5-baba97b3ec1f@amd.com \
--to=felix.kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=shane.xiao@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox