From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
To: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>,
"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tursulin@igalia.com>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>, kernel-dev@igalia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/amdgpu: Add amdgpu_bo_is_vm_bo helper
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 14:34:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f450f423-2a37-4677-a961-5dfcec464e87@igalia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e7ee1c2d-9c1c-456f-bee6-8971b9e4fb2f@gmail.com>
On 29/04/2024 12:02, Christian König wrote:
> Am 26.04.24 um 18:43 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
>>
>> Help code readability by replacing a bunch of:
>>
>> bo->tbo.base.resv == vm->root.bo->tbo.base.resv
>>
>> With:
>>
>> amdgpu_bo_is_vm_bo(bo, vm)
>>
>> No functional changes.
>
> Ah,yes that was on my TODO list as well.
>
> But I would have rather added this to the VM instead. In other words
> move it to amdgpu_vm.h and call it amdgpu_vm_is_bo_always_valid() or
> something like that.
I am happy to move it around as long as you are sure amdgpu_vm.h is the
location.
For instance main API there it seems to be amdgpu_vm_bo's. At least all
the amdgpu_bo usages do not needing anything more that the struct
forward declared.
So if I move the helper there I either need to make it include another
header, or move the helper out of line to amdgpu_vm.c.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Tvrtko
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h | 14 ++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 31 +++++++++-------------
>> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
>> index 67c234bcf89f..32e4a9c6e805 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
>> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static int amdgpu_gem_object_open(struct
>> drm_gem_object *obj,
>> return -EPERM;
>> if (abo->flags & AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VM_ALWAYS_VALID &&
>> - abo->tbo.base.resv != vm->root.bo->tbo.base.resv)
>> + !amdgpu_bo_is_vm_bo(abo, vm))
>> return -EPERM;
>> r = amdgpu_bo_reserve(abo, false);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
>> index be679c42b0b8..f2bb6965cc77 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
>> @@ -307,6 +307,20 @@ static inline struct amdgpu_bo
>> *amdgpu_bo_shadowed(struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
>> return NULL;
>> }
>> +/**
>> + * amdgpu_bo_is_vm_bo - check if the BO is VM always valid
>> + *
>> + * @abo: BO to be tested.
>> + * @vm: VM to test against.
>> + *
>> + * Returns true if the BO is VM always valid.
>> + */
>> +static inline bool amdgpu_bo_is_vm_bo(struct amdgpu_bo *bo,
>> + struct amdgpu_vm *vm)
>> +{
>> + return bo && bo->tbo.base.resv == vm->root.bo->tbo.base.resv;
>> +}
>> +
>> bool amdgpu_bo_is_amdgpu_bo(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
>> void amdgpu_bo_placement_from_domain(struct amdgpu_bo *abo, u32
>> domain);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>> index 8af3f0fd3073..6d6f0e325172 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>> @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ void amdgpu_vm_bo_base_init(struct
>> amdgpu_vm_bo_base *base,
>> base->next = bo->vm_bo;
>> bo->vm_bo = base;
>> - if (bo->tbo.base.resv != vm->root.bo->tbo.base.resv)
>> + if (!amdgpu_bo_is_vm_bo(bo, vm))
>> return;
>> dma_resv_assert_held(vm->root.bo->tbo.base.resv);
>> @@ -1101,13 +1101,12 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_bo_get_memory(struct
>> amdgpu_bo_va *bo_va,
>> * For now ignore BOs which are currently locked and potentially
>> * changing their location.
>> */
>> - if (bo->tbo.base.resv != vm->root.bo->tbo.base.resv &&
>> - !dma_resv_trylock(bo->tbo.base.resv))
>> + if (!amdgpu_bo_is_vm_bo(bo, vm) &&
>> !dma_resv_trylock(bo->tbo.base.resv))
>> return;
>> amdgpu_bo_get_memory(bo, stats);
>> - if (bo->tbo.base.resv != vm->root.bo->tbo.base.resv)
>> - dma_resv_unlock(bo->tbo.base.resv);
>> + if (amdgpu_bo_is_vm_bo(bo, vm))
>> + dma_resv_unlock(bo->tbo.base.resv);
>> }
>> void amdgpu_vm_get_memory(struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>> @@ -1203,8 +1202,7 @@ int amdgpu_vm_bo_update(struct amdgpu_device
>> *adev, struct amdgpu_bo_va *bo_va,
>> uncached = false;
>> }
>> - if (clear || (bo && bo->tbo.base.resv ==
>> - vm->root.bo->tbo.base.resv))
>> + if (clear || amdgpu_bo_is_vm_bo(bo, vm))
>> last_update = &vm->last_update;
>> else
>> last_update = &bo_va->last_pt_update;
>> @@ -1246,7 +1244,7 @@ int amdgpu_vm_bo_update(struct amdgpu_device
>> *adev, struct amdgpu_bo_va *bo_va,
>> * the evicted list so that it gets validated again on the
>> * next command submission.
>> */
>> - if (bo && bo->tbo.base.resv == vm->root.bo->tbo.base.resv) {
>> + if (amdgpu_bo_is_vm_bo(bo, vm)) {
>> uint32_t mem_type = bo->tbo.resource->mem_type;
>> if (!(bo->preferred_domains &
>> @@ -1640,10 +1638,9 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_bo_insert_map(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>> if (mapping->flags & AMDGPU_PTE_PRT)
>> amdgpu_vm_prt_get(adev);
>> - if (bo && bo->tbo.base.resv == vm->root.bo->tbo.base.resv &&
>> - !bo_va->base.moved) {
>> + if (amdgpu_bo_is_vm_bo(bo, vm) && !bo_va->base.moved)
>> amdgpu_vm_bo_moved(&bo_va->base);
>> - }
>> +
>> trace_amdgpu_vm_bo_map(bo_va, mapping);
>> }
>> @@ -1922,8 +1919,7 @@ int amdgpu_vm_bo_clear_mappings(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>> if (before->flags & AMDGPU_PTE_PRT)
>> amdgpu_vm_prt_get(adev);
>> - if (bo && bo->tbo.base.resv == vm->root.bo->tbo.base.resv &&
>> - !before->bo_va->base.moved)
>> + if (amdgpu_bo_is_vm_bo(bo, vm) && !before->bo_va->base.moved)
>> amdgpu_vm_bo_moved(&before->bo_va->base);
>> } else {
>> kfree(before);
>> @@ -1937,8 +1933,7 @@ int amdgpu_vm_bo_clear_mappings(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>> if (after->flags & AMDGPU_PTE_PRT)
>> amdgpu_vm_prt_get(adev);
>> - if (bo && bo->tbo.base.resv == vm->root.bo->tbo.base.resv &&
>> - !after->bo_va->base.moved)
>> + if (amdgpu_bo_is_vm_bo(bo, vm) && !after->bo_va->base.moved)
>> amdgpu_vm_bo_moved(&after->bo_va->base);
>> } else {
>> kfree(after);
>> @@ -2017,7 +2012,7 @@ void amdgpu_vm_bo_del(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>> if (bo) {
>> dma_resv_assert_held(bo->tbo.base.resv);
>> - if (bo->tbo.base.resv == vm->root.bo->tbo.base.resv)
>> + if (amdgpu_bo_is_vm_bo(bo, vm))
>> ttm_bo_set_bulk_move(&bo->tbo, NULL);
>> for (base = &bo_va->base.bo->vm_bo; *base;
>> @@ -2111,7 +2106,7 @@ void amdgpu_vm_bo_invalidate(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>> for (bo_base = bo->vm_bo; bo_base; bo_base = bo_base->next) {
>> struct amdgpu_vm *vm = bo_base->vm;
>> - if (evicted && bo->tbo.base.resv ==
>> vm->root.bo->tbo.base.resv) {
>> + if (evicted && amdgpu_bo_is_vm_bo(bo, vm)) {
>> amdgpu_vm_bo_evicted(bo_base);
>> continue;
>> }
>> @@ -2122,7 +2117,7 @@ void amdgpu_vm_bo_invalidate(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>> if (bo->tbo.type == ttm_bo_type_kernel)
>> amdgpu_vm_bo_relocated(bo_base);
>> - else if (bo->tbo.base.resv == vm->root.bo->tbo.base.resv)
>> + else if (amdgpu_bo_is_vm_bo(bo, vm))
>> amdgpu_vm_bo_moved(bo_base);
>> else
>> amdgpu_vm_bo_invalidated(bo_base);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-30 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-26 16:43 [PATCH 0/3] Some refactoring and maybe a memory accounting fixlet Tvrtko Ursulin
2024-04-26 16:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/amdgpu: Add amdgpu_bo_is_vm_bo helper Tvrtko Ursulin
2024-04-29 11:02 ` Christian König
2024-04-29 13:34 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2024-04-29 13:51 ` Christian König
2024-04-26 16:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/amdgpu: Reduce mem_type to domain double indirection Tvrtko Ursulin
2024-04-29 11:03 ` Christian König
2024-04-29 13:38 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2024-04-26 16:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/amdgpu: Fix pinned GART area accounting and fdinfo reporting Tvrtko Ursulin
2024-04-26 22:24 ` Felix Kuehling
2024-04-29 9:43 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2024-04-29 11:11 ` Christian König
2024-04-29 13:45 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2024-04-29 14:34 ` Felix Kuehling
2024-04-29 14:43 ` Felix Kuehling
2024-04-29 16:51 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2024-04-29 11:06 ` Christian König
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-29 16:47 [PATCH 1/3] drm/amdgpu: Add amdgpu_bo_is_vm_bo helper Tvrtko Ursulin
2024-05-03 6:26 ` Christian König
2024-05-03 8:23 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2024-05-03 8:27 ` Christian König
2024-05-03 9:14 Tvrtko Ursulin
2024-05-06 16:26 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2024-05-08 5:42 ` Christian König
2024-05-08 8:26 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2024-05-16 12:21 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2024-05-17 11:02 ` Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f450f423-2a37-4677-a961-5dfcec464e87@igalia.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=tursulin@igalia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox