AMD-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
To: "Marek Olšák" <maraeo@gmail.com>
Cc: amd-gfx mailing list <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: add AMDGPU_INFO_VM_STAT to return GPU VM
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:23:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe0ca4a4-b339-20ab-fd42-68b2a5e00e9c@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAxE2A5fWDp==muWuXSXuGGHtT_RThLpC1rK92c2mLVLdmGdUQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4047 bytes --]

Am 10.01.23 um 16:28 schrieb Marek Olšák:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 9:51 AM Christian König 
> <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     Am 04.01.23 um 00:08 schrieb Marek Olšák:
>>     I see about the access now, but did you even look at the patch?
>
>     I did look at the patch, but I haven't fully understood yet what
>     you are trying to do here.
>
>
> First and foremost, it returns the evicted size of VRAM and visible 
> VRAM, and returns visible VRAM usage. It should be obvious which stat 
> includes the size of another.
>
>
>>     Because what the patch does isn't even exposed to common drm
>>     code, such as the preferred domain and visible VRAM placement, so
>>     it can't be in fdinfo right now.
>>
>>     Or do you even know what fdinfo contains? Because it contains
>>     nothing useful. It only has VRAM and GTT usage, which we already
>>     have in the INFO ioctl, so it has nothing that we need. We mainly
>>     need the eviction information and visible VRAM information now.
>>     Everything else is a bonus.
>
>     Well the main question is what are you trying to get from that
>     information? The eviction list for example is completely
>     meaningless to userspace, that stuff is only temporary and will be
>     cleared on the next CS again.
>
>
> I don't know what you mean. The returned eviction stats look correct 
> and are stable (they don't change much). You can suggest changes if 
> you think some numbers are not reported correctly.
>
>
>     What we could expose is the VRAM over-commit value, e.g. how much
>     BOs which where supposed to be in VRAM are in GTT now. I think
>     that's what you are looking for here, right?
>
>
> The VRAM overcommit value is "evicted_vram".
>
>
>>     Also, it's undesirable to open and parse a text file if we can
>>     just call an ioctl.
>
>     Well I see the reasoning for that, but I also see why other
>     drivers do a lot of the stuff we have as IOCTL as separate files
>     in sysfs, fdinfo or debugfs.
>
>     Especially repeating all the static information which were already
>     available under sysfs in the INFO IOCTL was a design mistake as
>     far as I can see. Just compare what AMDGPU and the KFD code is
>     doing to what for example i915 is doing.
>
>     Same for things like debug information about a process. The fdinfo
>     stuff can be queried from external tools (gdb, gputop, umr etc...)
>     as well which makes that interface more preferred.
>
>
> Nothing uses fdinfo in Mesa. No driver uses sysfs in Mesa except drm 
> shims, noop drivers, and Intel for perf metrics. sysfs itself is an 
> unusable mess for the PCIe query and is missing information.
>
> I'm not against exposing more stuff through sysfs and fdinfo for 
> tools, but I don't see any reason why drivers should use it (other 
> than for slowing down queries and initialization).

That's what I'm asking: Is this for some tool or to make some driver 
decision based on it?

If you just want the numbers for over displaying then I think it would 
be better to put this into fdinfo together with the other existing stuff 
there.

If you want to make allocation decisions based on this then we should 
have that as IOCTL or even better as mmap() page between kernel and 
userspace. But in this case I would also calculation the numbers 
completely different as well.

See we have at least the following things in the kernel:
1. The eviction list in the VM.
     Those are the BOs which are currently evicted and tried to moved 
back in on the next CS.

2. The VRAM over commit value.
     In other words how much more VRAM than available has the 
application tried to allocate?

3. The visible VRAM usage by this application.

The end goal is that the eviction list will go away, e.g. we will always 
have stable allocations based on allocations of other applications and 
not constantly swap things in and out.

When you now expose the eviction list to userspace we will be stuck with 
this interface forever.

Christian.

>
> Marek

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7578 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-10 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-30 22:07 [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: add AMDGPU_INFO_VM_STAT to return GPU VM Marek Olšák
2022-12-30 22:10 ` Marek Olšák
2023-01-02 15:56 ` Christian König
2023-01-02 17:57   ` Marek Olšák
2023-01-03  8:33     ` Christian König
2023-01-03 23:08       ` Marek Olšák
2023-01-04 14:51         ` Christian König
2023-01-10 15:28           ` Marek Olšák
2023-01-10 16:23             ` Christian König [this message]
2023-01-10 16:55               ` Marek Olšák
2023-01-21  0:45                 ` Marek Olšák
2023-01-23  9:31                   ` Christian König
2023-01-24  7:37                     ` Marek Olšák
2023-01-24  7:58                       ` Christian König
2023-01-24  8:13                         ` Marek Olšák
2023-01-24  8:27                           ` Marek Olšák
2023-01-24  8:29                             ` Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fe0ca4a4-b339-20ab-fd42-68b2a5e00e9c@gmail.com \
    --to=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maraeo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox