Re: [PATCH v9 2/5] iommu: Implement of_iommu_get_resv_regions()

[Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>]

On 2022-10-07 16:28, Thierry Reding wrote:
[...]
>>> @@ -172,3 +173,106 @@ const struct iommu_ops *of_iommu_configure(struct device *dev,
>>>    	return ops;
>>>    }
>>> +
>>> +static inline bool check_direct_mapping(struct device *dev, struct resource *phys,
>>
>> Where "phys" is the virtual address, right? :(
> 
> No, phys is actually res passed in from of_iommu_get_resv_regions()
> where it is the address read from the "reg" property. So that's the
> physical address of the reserved region. Perhaps it'd be useful to
> rename "res" to "phys" in that function to be a little more consistent.
> It's actually the "start" and "end" values that are passed into this
> function that refer to the I/O virtual addresses from iommu-addresses.

Oh, so it's the phys_addr_t's that aren't physical addresses - well, it 
had to be wrong one way or the other :)

I agree that s/res/phys/ in the main function, and maybe s/start/iova/ 
too, would be helpful.

Thanks,
Robin.