From: "Trevor Cullen" <tcc@innovelec.co.uk>
To: 'Kalle Valo' <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>,
'Vu Hai NGUYEN' <vh.nguyen@actiasodielec.fr>
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: RE: Performance of ath10k
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:54:41 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <005b01cf3f6b$6c6c4840$4544d8c0$@innovelec.co.uk> (raw)
There's much debate going on in my circles about this card. It's based on
the QCA XB140 reference design which supposedly supports 11a,b,g,n, ac at
2.4G or 5G (not concurrent).
So does ath10k support this card fully?
Trevor
-----Original Message-----
From: ath10k [mailto:ath10k-bounces@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Kalle
Valo
Sent: 14 March 2014 09:18
To: Vu Hai NGUYEN
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Performance of ath10k
Vu Hai NGUYEN <vh.nguyen@actiasodielec.fr> writes:
> I'm doing an internship for6 month and my mission is implementation a
> module of 802.11ac in a mini cpu to create an access point of wifi.
> After looking in the internet for a while, I found this potential
> product from Compex:
> http://www.compex.com.sg/productdetailinfo.asp?model=WLE900VX I wonder
> if is there anyone here have tried this with the driver ath10k and
> does it work well or there's still many bugs?
FWIW I'm using ath10k on my main AP at home on 5G (and ath9k on 2.4G) and I
haven't recently had any major problems preventing use. The uptime right now
is:
11:15:46 up 17 days, 16:39, load average: 0.13, 0.11, 0.13
But as I'm the ath10k maintainer I'm biased :)
--
Kalle Valo
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next reply other threads:[~2014-03-14 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-14 9:54 Trevor Cullen [this message]
2014-03-14 10:34 ` Performance of ath10k Kalle Valo
2014-03-15 1:45 ` Yeoh Chun-Yeow
2014-03-15 7:50 ` Kalle Valo
2014-03-14 21:34 ` Ben Greear
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-03-14 9:05 Vu Hai NGUYEN
2014-03-14 9:18 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='005b01cf3f6b$6c6c4840$4544d8c0$@innovelec.co.uk' \
--to=tcc@innovelec.co.uk \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=vh.nguyen@actiasodielec.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox