From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Wl0VN-0000p3-CL for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 15 May 2014 18:35:45 +0000 From: greearb@candelatech.com Subject: [PATCH] ath10k: Ensure rx-frag ignores rssi. Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 11:35:23 -0700 Message-Id: <1400178923-26306-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k@lists.infradead.org Cc: Ben Greear From: Ben Greear It seems ath10k firmware gives us no way to know the rssi for rx-fragments. Signed-off-by: Ben Greear --- Patch is against my tree, hopefully will apply OK against upstream but have not tested that yet. drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c index f94ac44..f62b0e4 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c @@ -1343,6 +1343,7 @@ static void ath10k_htt_rx_frag_handler(struct ath10k_htt *htt, } /* FIXME: implement signal strength */ + rx_status->flag |= RX_FLAG_NO_SIGNAL_VAL; hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)msdu_head->data; rxd = (void *)msdu_head->data - sizeof(*rxd); -- 1.7.11.7 _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k