From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49] helo=sipsolutions.net) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XLUKU-0000XG-SV for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 09:43:19 +0000 Message-ID: <1408873339.24483.0.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] ath10k: provide firmware crash info via debugfs From: Johannes Berg Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 11:42:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87egw8a8zg.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <20140821124705.27159.67898.stgit@potku.adurom.net> <20140821124907.27159.64620.stgit@potku.adurom.net> <1408626616.4388.0.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <877g21c3dd.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <1408670355.4388.4.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <87egw8a8zg.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Kalle Valo Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 17:34 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > We really would have use for this, that's why I'm hesitant to wait more. > Even having this from an "unofficial" location would be a big help. If > it's ok for you, I would like to apply this once all review comments are > addressed. But naturally if you think it's better to wait, I will do > that. No, I don't care what you do. I'm just saying I'm working on a framework, so you might want to wait. If you don't, that's perfectly fine with me. johannes _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k