From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from alexa-out-tai-01.qualcomm.com ([103.229.16.226]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i8cfC-0007CS-Kc for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 03:54:29 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] ath10k: improve throughout of tcp/udp TX/RX of sdio From: Wen Gong Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 03:54:14 +0000 Message-ID: <1568346854209.29270@qti.qualcomm.com> References: <1567679893-14029-1-git-send-email-wgong@codeaurora.org> <87tv9hikwe.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>, <87d0g5h07v.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: <87d0g5h07v.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Content-Language: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: "kvalo@codeaurora.org" , Wen Gong Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" >>> The bottleneck of throughout on sdio chip is the bus bandwidth, to the >>>patches are all to increase the use ratio of sdio bus. >> I tried to apply patches 2-8, patch 2 had a conflict due to my changes >> and patch 8 didn't apply at all. Also I saw few warnings with the >> patches I was able to test: HI kalle, i see some warning is from patch "ath10k: add fw coredump for sdio when firmware assert" and this patch also have change in sdio.c, so maybe it will have conflict with the 8 patches. patch 8 didn't apply at all, is it means each change of the patch is conflict? I used command to check each patch. perl ~/opensource/checkpatch.pl --strict --no-tree --max-line-length=90 --show-types --ignore CONST_STRUCT ./* I found it not check Wunused-but-set-variable. _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k