From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hNI2R-00014G-QH for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 14:22:49 +0000 Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id e18so8942156lja.5 for ; Sun, 05 May 2019 07:22:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Erik Stromdahl Subject: ath10k: Two missing sdio patches Message-ID: <1d5b4f00-2da8-b435-9122-07f93890dda9@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 5 May 2019 16:22:42 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Kalle Valo , wgong@codeaurora.org, "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" Hej Kalle, Wen, I see there are lots of SDIO patches coming in to the mailing ath10k list, great! I while back I submitted two patches that adds an inline wrapper for an htt op. patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/?series=97099 Without these patches I get a panic due to calling a NULL pointer callback with SDIO. It is the htt->tx_ops->htt_h2t_aggr_cfg_msg() in ath10k_htt_setup() that causes the panic. Kalle: I notice that you don't have these patches in your pending-sdio-usb branch. Wen: Do you have any other patch that fixes this issue (I can't see how it can work without these patches unless you have some other fix)? -- Erik _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k