From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>,
"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: Re: ath10k: calibration data through Device Tree?
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 17:25:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141003162513.GW26643@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2386503.dNPayhXJTQ@wuerfel>
> From a system design point, it's still horrible that you have to use
> DT for a device that is on a discoverable bus like PCI, but as you describe,
> the reality is that products are shipping that use ath10k PCI devices
> without this data in them.
I'd see any DT property for this as a workaround, the use of which
should be discouraged.
A fun question that springs to mind is can the ath10k chip be removed,
and if so am I able to place it into a non-DT system (whereupon I have
no calibration data, so it won't work)?
Mark.
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-03 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-02 13:14 ath10k: calibration data through Device Tree? Kalle Valo
2014-10-02 13:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-02 13:47 ` Kalle Valo
2014-10-02 14:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-02 14:55 ` Kalle Valo
2014-10-02 15:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-02 13:29 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-02 13:44 ` Kalle Valo
2014-10-02 15:07 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-02 19:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-02 19:28 ` Adrian Chadd
2014-10-02 19:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-07 16:44 ` Kalle Valo
2014-10-17 12:25 ` Kumar Gala
2014-10-22 12:02 ` Kalle Valo
2014-10-03 15:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-03 16:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-03 16:25 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2014-10-03 16:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-03 16:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-03 17:21 ` Adrian Chadd
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-10-02 13:05 Kalle Valo
2014-10-02 13:09 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141003162513.GW26643@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox