From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from dvalin.narfation.org ([213.160.73.56]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jSIlu-0004H1-1q for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 11:15:00 +0000 From: Sven Eckelmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: increase rx buffer size to 2048 Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 13:14:42 +0200 Message-ID: <3097447.aZuNXRJysd@sven-edge> In-Reply-To: <3300912.TRQvxCK2vZ@bentobox> References: <20200205191043.21913-1-linus.luessing@c0d3.blue> <3300912.TRQvxCK2vZ@bentobox> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6648046091867572953==" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k@lists.infradead.org Cc: Linus =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=FCssing?= , Simon Wunderlich , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mail@adrianschmutzler.de, Ben Greear , "David S . Miller" , Kalle Valo , Linus =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=FCssing?= --===============6648046091867572953== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart9684083.LlcNlZrpYr"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --nextPart9684083.LlcNlZrpYr Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 09:00:49 CEST Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Wednesday, 5 February 2020 20:10:43 CEST Linus L=FCssing wrote: > > From: Linus L=FCssing > >=20 > > Before, only frames with a maximum size of 1528 bytes could be > > transmitted between two 802.11s nodes. > >=20 > > For batman-adv for instance, which adds its own header to each frame, > > we typically need an MTU of at least 1532 bytes to be able to transmit > > without fragmentation. > >=20 > > This patch now increases the maxmimum frame size from 1528 to 1656 > > bytes. > [...] >=20 > @Kalle, I saw that this patch was marked as deferred [1] but I couldn't f= ind=20 > any mail why it was done so. It seems like this currently creates real wo= rld=20 > problems - so would be nice if you could explain shortly what is currentl= y=20 > blocking its acceptance. Ping? Kind regards, Sven > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11367055/ --nextPart9684083.LlcNlZrpYr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEF10rh2Elc9zjMuACXYcKB8Eme0YFAl6kG6IACgkQXYcKB8Em e0blZhAAtUz1zZuJUiX3gvEu7u03vcUEh+9wxlrnYwC+XmWyXWZ0lswqB5egTyd0 2XbsmAXldRfVz6HV/Gly3WGR2QBxVCkQPhEhDuUBDuNFnp/QL2+qnriubgRlDYSp lIVP1REqUJcADEM92Bec8vWub35lxIwMj3j/DpR9gQ/toJu9C/1Gnuw9i40WTF3i K+BMaPwR33aGAdTRDh1fK0zWcpuzRIOMGJf4HhoOgm3HU0K07P64UXC4x40uU1zi G7Tn6SekHgtio5DmRRualgp28QE69XK66W25mbLxaZQcvnUHuNEoMZC+bJh+kYkN pZiVdlUx6CM+CqSuztHCYT7Dgl3hC8KbTRAfVSY1M44NChglAIO3WXuHasyeqJHn n9BJ+q9+AcemX1whESG16iA10KMK/8PsRF9ynzM05W+JiwvDiTB0JbEfS0h4eur0 dwiavSaAvnhoXV2bra4XxuqDxQWjagq11FCIpMg1U4WpuZSKit2K6hL31wHChsK7 O03j+un9EU/UHlDRb4G2EM1UU3t6JngjUDlzPr1lNkVFCwiFO4wh4e8nm+GiRmuc yj1Wq7FREyBhhDbktr56SFLHoAluhshb2QRE+8yNAELZEi+mKS08kY/c6FVxPo63 elfS4ktzDlNtkQO4agAAPAmIOijysXjj7mG8a+5A8vhX4Y+s6Ck= =2W59 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart9684083.LlcNlZrpYr-- --===============6648046091867572953== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k --===============6648046091867572953==--