From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Alexis Green <agreen@cococorp.com>, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Throughput weirdness on 9984
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 14:51:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <35fa0be2-6ac6-0f7f-cb4e-e8bfced4199c@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAnMG+NUtOyxrzyXc4TyzPR8nuz2RcG80+GBwEZdfBFDknL2eQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/02/2016 02:11 PM, Alexis Green wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As I was working with ath10k drivers, I have discovered that only CT
> firmware/driver combination is able to report tx_info to mac80211
> layer. I've built latest LEDE image for my hardware (Netgear Nighthawk
> X4S R7800) with both ath10k-ct driver from Ben and CT firmware. This
> combination of software provides the data I need, however, the
> throughput is severely limited :/
>
> All tests are performed between two of these devices in mesh mode with
> no encryption. Here are some of the iperf results:
I have not actually tested mesh-mode on my firmware, so maybe I caused
regressions related to that.
If you use AP + STA config, is throughput better?
What about IBSS?
What tx/rx rates is CT firmware actually reporting? Maybe it is not
enabling HT/VHT for some reason?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-02 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-02 21:11 Throughput weirdness on 9984 Alexis Green
2016-09-02 21:51 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2016-09-02 22:14 ` Alexis Green
2016-09-02 22:52 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=35fa0be2-6ac6-0f7f-cb4e-e8bfced4199c@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=agreen@cococorp.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox