From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-cys01nam02on0050.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.37.50] helo=NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1dV6KS-0007KL-MR for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 01:20:38 +0000 Subject: Re: WARN_ON_ONCE(work > weight) in napi_poll() References: <26670dce-4dd2-f8e4-0e14-90d74257e739@virtuozzo.com> <87wp7oia6j.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <952aefe1-6f6a-3978-e7e7-5e74076f26a3@virtuozzo.com> <8cb28d9b-41c9-043c-16ca-f0bea41944e9@virtuozzo.com> From: Igor Mitsyanko Message-ID: <3ce246b3-b110-dd50-bf29-45ee78985872@quantenna.com> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:19:51 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8cb28d9b-41c9-043c-16ca-f0bea41944e9@virtuozzo.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Andrey Ryabinin , Ryan Hsu , Kalle Valo Cc: Networking , linux-wireless , LKML , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" On 07/11/2017 10:28 AM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: > > It gave me this: > > [118648.825347] #1 quota too big 72 64 16 > [118648.825351] #2 quota too big 72 64 16 > [118648.825471] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [118648.825484] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at ../net/core/dev.c:5274 net_rx_action+0x258/0x360 > > So this means that we didn't met the condition bellow, i.e. skb_queue_empty() returned true. > > ath10k_htt_txrx_compl_task(): > > if ((quota > ATH10K_NAPI_QUOTA_LIMIT) && > !skb_queue_empty(&htt->rx_in_ord_compl_q)) { > resched_napi = true; > goto exit; > } > >> Also WLAN.RM.2.0-00180-QCARMSWPZ-1 firmware is a bit old, could you also update firmware to give it a try? >> https://github.com/kvalo/ath10k-firmware/tree/master/QCA6174/hw3.0/4.4 >> > > Will try. > Maybe ath10k_htt_rx_in_ord_ind() has to accept "budget_left" parameter and use it to limit number of processed MSDUs in queued AMSDU and saving rest for later (NAPI has to be rescheduled in this case). It seems natural that this problem happens with current logic, in case AMSDU in Rx queue has more elements then left in budget. _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k