Re: Anyone have luck with WLE900VX?

From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: ath10k <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Anyone have luck with WLE900VX?
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:35:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <530B90E0.8080101@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fvn8trh2.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>

On 02/24/2014 08:17 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> writes:

>> Both NICs that I have tried so far report the same mostly bogus
>> MAC:  00:03:07:12:34:56
>>
>> The NIC's spec sheet claims it is 3x3, but 'iw phy phyX info' shows only
>> 2 streams supported for both the 2.4Ghz n band and the 5Ghz /ac band.
> 
> Hmm, I wonder if otp.bin fails. Can you check what result code you get
> from otp.bin? Add something like this to ath10k_download_and_run_otp():
> 
> 	ret = ath10k_bmi_execute(ar, address, &exec_param);
>         ath10k_dbg(ATH10K_DBG_BOOT, "boot otp execute result %d\n", exec_param);

I tried the standard .389 firmware that mine is based on, and I see similar non-working
behaviour, so it does not appear to be a bug I added to my firmware.

I also notice that the otp binary in the .467.1-1 firmware is a fair bit bigger
than what is included in the .389 firmware.

So, probably I need fixes to otp (at least).

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k