From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp.duncanthrax.net ([2001:470:70c5:1111::170]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WriqK-00050j-AX for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 07:09:10 +0000 Message-ID: <538D7542.2070007@stackframe.org> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 09:12:02 +0200 From: Sven Schnelle MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] ath10k: testmode support References: <20140528091832.8030.93169.stgit@potku.adurom.net> <538B8446.50301@stackframe.org> <87iooj1fds.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: <87iooj1fds.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org Hi Kalle, On 06/02/2014 05:48 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Sven Schnelle writes: > >> Only one small thing: The firmware expects the UTF commands in >> segmented format. Should that splitting be done in your testmode >> patch, or should userspace handle that? > I would prefer to keep the driver as simple as possible. My idea here is > that the testmode interface is only about tranmitting and receiving WMI > packets, it does not look at all what's inside the packet. AFAIK the > user space should be able to handle everything on it's own. > Ok, that's fine with me. I'm doing the fragmation in userspace already, just wanted to mention that. Thanks Sven _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k