From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from linuxlounge.net ([2a01:4f8:d16:1fc5::2]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YCDzR-0001PQ-0n for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 20:59:33 +0000 Received: from [172.31.97.157] (p4FF0C043.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.240.192.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by linuxlounge.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4273E2DE1C7 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:59:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54B97B96.4040903@darmstadt.freifunk.net> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:59:02 +0100 From: Martin Weinelt MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Valid Interface Combinations: IBSS + AP in parallel? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k@lists.infradead.org Hello, I wanted to kindly ask for information on ath10ks future. We, the Freifunk-Community in Germany, are currently heavily using ath9k, which supports IBSS + AP mode in parallel, to do meshing and service clients at the same time. Ath10k currently does not seem to support that. Are there any plans to include this possibility or is this out of the question? Kind regards, Martin Weinelt Freifunk-Darmstadt _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k