From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Jorge Baranda <jbaranda@cttc.es>,
ath10k@lists.infradead.org, "Harms,
Hannes" <hannes.harms@tu-bs.de>
Subject: Re: CT 4.2 kernel now supports 80Mhz IBSS
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:01:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56056FCA.3070602@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5604FE30.3000609@cttc.es>
On 09/25/2015 12:56 AM, Jorge Baranda wrote:
> Hi Harms,
>
> Thank you very much for your aclaration. I was trying to follow your setup with the CT kernel 4.0, but with no success, so after the post of Ben, I imagine I
> have to install CT 4.2 kernel.
> By the way, I suppose that I have already this patch in my folder of the kernel 4.2 since I downloaded it from git (17/09/15) after you made your post. Just in
> case, could you point me out to the patch you are refering to?
> Other thing, which CT firmware are you using (mine Release14)? Additionally, could you share your .config file for the CT 4.2 kernel? I'm having some troubles
> to make this kernel running and I am a little confused.
Please grab the latest CT 4.2 kernel, I rebased the last 10 or so patches a day or two ago:
# This first command blows away the first 20 commits, so if you have
# added your own patches, then you need to deal with that properly.
git reset --hard HEAD~20
git pull
The configs I use are in ./configs/
In particular, the patch I added to enable HT80 IBSS was this:
http://dmz2.candelatech.com/?p=linux-4.2.dev.y/.git;a=commit;h=c620066342699f63dcdd00ce5f4d0feb4f02b1fc
Thanks,
Ben
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Jordi
>
>
> El 25/09/15 09:47, Harms, Hannes escribió:
>> Hi,
>>
>> yes, I was able to get 80 MHz IBSS working with CT 4.2 , but
>> I also integrated the missing patch to my kernel even before Ben mentioned that the patch was missing.
>> I also forgot that I made this change, sorry
>>
>> Regards Hannes
>>
>>
>> Am 25.09.2015 um 08:48 schrieb Jorge Baranda:
>>> Hi Ben,
>>>
>>> I imagine, I am one of the guys you are refering to.
>>> Within the thread "WLE600VX from PCEngines", I was trying to make working a HT80 IBSS connection with wpa_supplicant, but this connection was only set to 20MHz.
>>> I was trying this with the 4.0 kernel, the 10.1.467-ct-14 firmware and the last version (git) of wpa_supplicant (2.5). By the way, has anyone tried this?
>>>
>>> Then, due to this failure, I tried kernel 4.2 because Hannes Harm reported success to set HT80 IBSS. But I was not able to configure properly this kernel
>>> (compile OK, but the computer does not boot then).
>>>
>>> @Ben, could you share a .config file for kernel 4.2? Do you think that Release14 CT firmware would be able to work? I will update the 4.2 kernel, compile it
>>> and try to see
>>> if I can set up the HT80 IBSS connection.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jorge
>>>
>>>
>>> El 24/09/15 01:56, Ben Greear escribió:
>>>> I forget exactly all who was asking for this...but hopefully
>>>> they are reading this list...
>>>>
>>>> I was missing a patch that allowed HT80 IBSS in my 4.2.
>>>>
>>>> The beta-15 CT firmware appears to do HT80 IBSS just fine
>>>> with the 4.2 kernel now.
>>>>
>>>> I have not attempted to enable this feature on my 4.0 kernel yet.
>>>>
>>>> Please also note, I've been hacking on rate-ctrl logic in both 4.0
>>>> and 4.2 kernels (and beta-15 firmware)..so if you try it and find
>>>> something weird, especially in probe requests or association requests,
>>>> please do let me know. Notes of success are welcome as well of course!
>>>>
>>>> http://www.candelatech.com/ath10k.php
>>>>
>>>> http://dmz2.candelatech.com/git/gitweb.cgi
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ben
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-25 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-23 23:56 CT 4.2 kernel now supports 80Mhz IBSS Ben Greear
2015-09-25 6:48 ` Jorge Baranda
2015-09-25 7:47 ` Harms, Hannes
2015-09-25 7:56 ` Jorge Baranda
2015-09-25 16:01 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2015-09-28 6:24 ` Jorge Baranda
2015-09-28 7:27 ` Janusz Dziedzic
2015-09-28 13:02 ` Jorge Baranda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56056FCA.3070602@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=hannes.harms@tu-bs.de \
--cc=jbaranda@cttc.es \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox