From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1bPub2-0002fD-GA for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:43:45 +0000 Message-ID: <578FAA12.4020509@candelatech.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:42:58 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: rx rate issue References: <20160614061728.570-1-rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> <1467218124941.40575@qti.qualcomm.com> <1468941948774.87860@qti.qualcomm.com> <578E5AFA.4000908@candelatech.com> <6487f1d3-339e-a6dd-d866-b11b37b4ddff@dd-wrt.com> In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Sebastian Gottschall , Michal Kazior Cc: "Valo, Kalle" , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" , "nbd@nbd.name" On 07/20/2016 04:12 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: > Am 20.07.2016 um 13:03 schrieb Michal Kazior: >>>>> WDS AP: >>>>> Peer MAC address 40:a5:ef:85:4d:6f >>>>> Peer RSSI 12 >>>>> Peer TX rate 175500 >>>>> Peer RX rate 175500 >>>>> Peer RX duration 0 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> WDS STA: >>>>> Peer MAC address 40:a5:ef:51:49:db >>>>> Peer RSSI 13 >>>>> Peer TX rate 175500 >>>>> Peer RX rate 351000 >>>>> Peer RX duration 0 >> [...] One thing, if your signal is really this hot (-12, -13), then you are likely over-saturating the RF logic. You normally get best results at around -40 signal level... Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k