From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtps.newmedia-net.de ([2a05:a1c0:0:de::167] helo=webmail.newmedia-net.de) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fYTfW-0004ax-2v for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 09:56:52 +0000 Subject: Re: 160 mhz crash References: <4e8058c7-6443-5b4c-3077-dd0325159854@dd-wrt.com> <1788770.Stodcpyumm@bentobox> From: Sebastian Gottschall Message-ID: <63afefbf-3ec2-786a-7ad1-e5e545da0617@dd-wrt.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 11:56:39 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1788770.Stodcpyumm@bentobox> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Sven Eckelmann , ath10k@lists.infradead.org Cc: Ansuel Smith btw. openwrt imported my patches recently, but with some openwrt specific modifications Am 28.06.2018 um 08:46 schrieb Sven Eckelmann: > On Samstag, 16. Juni 2018 10:11:27 CEST Sebastian Gottschall wrote: >> this is normal. i already posted a patch on this mailinglist to resolve >> this issue, but >> >> but it hasnt found its way to the main source yes. > Problem seems to be that the patch [1] has obvious style problems and open > questions. > > Kind regards, > Sven > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10372949/ _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k