Re: [PATCH v2] ath10k: Set DMA address mask to 35 bit for WCN3990

[Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>]

Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> writes:

> On Mon 03 Sep 09:37 PDT 2018, Rakesh Pillai wrote:
>
>> WCN3990 is a 37-bit target but can address memory range
>> only upto 35 bits. The 36th bit is used to control the
>> smmu/iommu translation and the 37th bit is used by the
>> internal bus masters to access the wifi subsystem internal
>> SRAM. With the DMA mask set to 37i-bit, the host driver
>> can get 37-bit dma address, which leads to incorrect
>> address access in the target.
>> 
>> Hence the host driver can used addresses upto 35-bit
>> for WCN3990. Fix the dma mask for wcn3990 to 35-bit,
>> instead of 37-bit.
>> 
>> Tested HW: WCN3990
>> Tested FW: WLAN.HL.2.0-01188-QCAHLSWMTPLZ-1
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pillai <pillair@codeaurora.org>
>
> This solves the problem I'm seeing on my SDM845, where I see a
> translation fault on a 32-bit address from the IOMMU, which we
> previously mapped the 36 bit version of (my dma-ranges is set to 36
> bits).
>
> So:
>
> Tested-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

Thanks for the reminder. This got piled up in my deferred queue in
patchwork and I hadn't looked at it yet. I'll queue this for -next.

> However, some of the changes in this patch and the fact that I get a
> translation error on the lower 32 bits of the mapped iova, makes me
> suspect that while the hardware is capable of 37 bits, the driver only
> dealt with the lower 32.  And if that's the case I would like to see
> that mentioned in the commit message.

Rakesh mentioned that it's actually 35 bits. Should something changed in
the commit log still? I can do that if needed.

-- 
Kalle Valo

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k