From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: Enrico Tagliavini <enrico.tagliavini@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: QCA6174 hw2.1 irq_mode=0 broken on 4.2-rc3, working on 4.1.2
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 09:54:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871tfr8ne9.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+BoTQkqttvPkk6qk6YV8SYPVnEcADfcUkLBCpjFoZBab81Byg@mail.gmail.com> (Michal Kazior's message of "Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:28:19 +0200")
Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com> writes:
>> This wont work for bisecting. I have to setup something else. Is
>> it ok if I restrict the bisect on the ath10k tree? That has enough
>> commit already to begin with, plus I'm going to be on the road in less
>> than two weeks.
>
> As long as you establish a working and a non-working commit id on
> kvalo tree it should be fine I guess.
And you can always limit the bisect to a certain directory, but the risk
here is that if the regression is outside ath10k bisect won't find it.
So you need to carefully consider is it safe to do or not. From the man
page:
"Cutting down bisection by giving more parameters to bisect start
You can further cut down the number of trials, if you know what
part of the tree is involved in the problem you are tracking
down, by specifying path parameters when issuing the bisect start
command:
$ git bisect start -- arch/i386 include/asm-i386"
Also if you can even just narrow down the regression to a smaller set of
patches, let's say few hundred, might make it easier to find the
regression.
--
Kalle Valo
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-29 6:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-27 20:08 QCA6174 hw2.1 irq_mode=0 broken on 4.2-rc3, working on 4.1.2 Enrico Tagliavini
2015-07-28 4:31 ` Michal Kazior
2015-07-28 11:00 ` Enrico Tagliavini
2015-07-28 11:26 ` Michal Kazior
2015-07-28 14:57 ` Enrico Tagliavini
2015-07-28 15:12 ` Alexandre Maloteaux
2015-07-28 15:50 ` Enrico Tagliavini
2015-07-29 5:25 ` Michal Kazior
2015-07-29 5:28 ` Michal Kazior
2015-07-29 6:54 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2015-07-29 9:02 ` Enrico Tagliavini
2015-07-29 9:30 ` Kalle Valo
2015-07-29 14:22 ` Enrico Tagliavini
2015-08-01 12:30 ` Enrico Tagliavini
2015-08-05 17:52 ` Enrico Tagliavini
2015-09-08 8:17 ` Enrico Tagliavini
2015-10-20 11:39 ` Enrico Tagliavini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871tfr8ne9.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=enrico.tagliavini@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox