From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.72]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Wkuiw-0003j0-FO for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 15 May 2014 12:25:22 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] ath10k: add implementation for configure max amsdu, ampdu References: <1400151186-24949-1-git-send-email-janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> <87egzv9te9.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 15:24:54 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Janusz Dziedzic's message of "Thu, 15 May 2014 13:35:49 +0200") Message-ID: <871tvv9qll.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Janusz Dziedzic Cc: while1eq1 , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" , markaswift Janusz Dziedzic writes: > On 15 May 2014 13:24, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> Did you somehow check that this command works as it should? > > Added WMI_DEBUG_EVENT in FW (_htt_tgt_tx_aggr_cfg): > > May 15 12:47:30 dell kernel: [ 6777.355444] ath10k: wmi event debug > print 'xxx amsdu: 3, ampdu: 64' // This is default :) > May 15 12:47:30 dell kernel: [ 6777.355477] ath10k: wmi event debug > print 'xxx data: 0x00014005, 81925' > May 15 12:47:30 dell kernel: [ 6777.355520] ath10k: wmi event debug > print 'xxx amsdu: 1, ampdu: 64' Ok, that's one way to test as well. I was more thinking about using sniffer or another way to check what's really happening on the air. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k