From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YdMXU-00038x-BL for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:34:54 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ath10k: improve set_bitrate_mask References: <1427798961-7334-1-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 20:34:20 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1427798961-7334-1-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> (Michal Kazior's message of "Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:49:19 +0000") Message-ID: <874mozycpv.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Michal Kazior Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org Michal Kazior writes: > This makes set_bitrate_mask more flexible by > allowing more than applying simple single rate or > max nss limits. > > This still isn't ideal and VHT MCSs can't be set > separately (only a few range-options are allowed). > > v2: > * fix ouf-of-bounds > * rebased to master branch + multi-channel patches > > This will not apply cleanly without multi-channel > support and conflict resolution will be > non-trivial. > > > Michal Kazior (2): > ath10k: clean up set_bitrate_mask handling Thanks, this patch applied. > ath10k: implement more versatile set_bitrate_mask This patch dropped as requested. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k