From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from sabertooth02.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.38]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WlHSL-0002Un-Vh for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 16 May 2014 12:41:46 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Ensure rx-frag ignores rssi. References: <1400178923-26306-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 15:41:17 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1400178923-26306-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> (greearb@candelatech.com's message of "Thu, 15 May 2014 11:35:23 -0700") Message-ID: <874n0p7v6a.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: greearb@candelatech.com Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org greearb@candelatech.com writes: > From: Ben Greear > > It seems ath10k firmware gives us no way to know > the rssi for rx-fragments. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Greear Janusz, are you ok with this? > Patch is against my tree, hopefully will apply OK against upstream > but have not tested that yet. Perfect, thanks for telling me this. Then I can just drop the patch if it doesn't apply. Oh, and it did apply cleanly to ath-next-test. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k