From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from sabertooth02.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.38]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WBIHc-0003jG-BE for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 06:17:56 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ath10k: Better tx/rx debugging. References: <1390435562-15473-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> <1390435562-15473-4-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> <87lhxqoghd.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <874n4enkbs.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <52F26BF1.7030105@candelatech.com> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 08:17:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <52F26BF1.7030105@candelatech.com> (Ben Greear's message of "Wed, 5 Feb 2014 08:50:57 -0800") Message-ID: <874n4ckbns.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Ben Greear Cc: Janusz Dziedzic , Marek Puzyniak , ath10k@lists.infradead.org Ben Greear writes: > On 02/05/2014 01:10 AM, Marek Puzyniak wrote: > >>>> So probably it would be better to have choice to enable this log print >>>> when someone need this information otherwise by default it should be >>>> disabled. >>> >>> Maybe a debug message is better? >> Yes, for example with flag ATH10K_DBG_HTT. > > That one is pretty spammy already..maybe I can create a new flag > ATH10K_DBG_RX or something like that that is specifically for RX logic > debugging? Yeah, that would be good. And then we can later add _TX for transmit side. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k