From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.toke.dk ([52.28.52.200]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gEBu9-0004tE-TS for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 11:28:24 +0000 From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Move TXQ scheduling and airtime fairness into mac80211 In-Reply-To: <1540033534-11211-1-git-send-email-rmanohar@codeaurora.org> References: <1540033534-11211-1-git-send-email-rmanohar@codeaurora.org> Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 13:27:58 +0200 Message-ID: <875zxvo7y9.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Rajkumar Manoharan , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org Rajkumar Manoharan writes: > Toke, > > It is been a while since mac80211 TXQ discussion started. Here is the consolidated > series of mac80211, ath9k and ath10k changes to move TXQ scheduling and airtime > fairness into mac80211. The major changes w.r.t 5th RFC version are in may_transmit() > API. Whenever the driver checks deficit for given TXQ, the list will be > reordered so that driver/firmware RR quickly becomes in sync with mac80211 > list. Also airtime tasklet approach cumbersome and causing regression > in multi client performance. Cool, thanks. I'll look at this in more detail later, but in the meantime, do you have any test results to share? Specifically, how did you measure that the fairness part actually works? :) -Toke _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k