From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D2B2CD5BC5 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 13:24:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc: To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=OVkTAppLsFFf+Ks9HliuThhoTqnhlpTNP2mfkOmmILY=; b=lLlz4Dy7ZgSHoZqyi7QX4B9dei RH1MECv21ekAJZFRI8FZOr5cyldrdYgkFX0Q6xuDCW0pVT/rB9e0cWsptWETQrmQi/Y5mL4pJVt0C +doUD7XLCxkHv7tE9726kZg2WxKfq1rUwhQ0qRBlUGs/9jB4R5zgktK/bHjRiI753LX8+Sbp33f+Z nJm5SYep2NqZg2RY75OHtFXAH+N7gJ6BPPVRMJpIWo76LlKp9hInPuGls4CZAXIyG0e2+6neCdoVq CCZfrOpvNoUK1sdaSvdbuS8H+wEldglhwhLLJhGCZ9zVo02bTS2hw0AHl0JH5VIW2I2U0FjlSZKAb kLjP3h+Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1smCSz-00000008WJ3-41ku; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 13:24:05 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1smCSG-00000008W5t-2ALM for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2024 13:23:22 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B145C3FC3; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 13:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE12FC4CEC3; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 13:23:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1725542599; bh=h+XbA3+VCIeuLn9lhEd8QO33LVVy/IJRQcMcL8Ekg3g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=FJNk0sKRWaKGiQHD2tLO2bJzbExykEVZTAnVu7Y7XOAyMw+ZkkBcdgilkwrHJ6yUk qbY8qZr6GdqhG9O0VfJ5Q8wGmY9W3TRAJoyjsM3uIqfV0pD24pjpw3k71A5CttjCXj Ol0XM/C3aR4oaDOC9x0RBQAfttl5vxKNXXcaAZElf1AWChmaJEUENSq6S+pKuhiZOH m/B2m/dg3qd+wlfVAnANk4ayhl4pZwir/BeqxNHuQc6W/XNPi4IvwFAUYFoyYFfnGv NLepWwPO6y4eZXTCPpuKoPpEiK01WFrIpPH5sovgzEqIBceh3SU+1FhtDZPUrSvET8 8/rjbdW8dUYPA== From: Kalle Valo To: Paul Menzel Cc: Baochen Qiang , James Prestwood , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, LKML Subject: Re: failed to remove key (0, ce:ce:1e:27:bb:e0) from hardware (-110) (ETIMEDOUT) References: <87bk13jwzv.fsf@kernel.org> <00dfdaab-4d26-45f6-b69d-049ae489b2bd@molgen.mpg.de> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 16:23:15 +0300 In-Reply-To: <00dfdaab-4d26-45f6-b69d-049ae489b2bd@molgen.mpg.de> (Paul Menzel's message of "Wed, 4 Sep 2024 23:42:35 +0200") Message-ID: <877cbqcjzw.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240905_062320_635866_1FFDAF07 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.51 ) X-BeenThere: ath10k@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+ath10k=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Paul Menzel writes: > Am 04.09.24 um 16:48 schrieb Kalle Valo: >> Paul Menzel writes: > >>> Linux 6.11-rc6+ logged the warning below when resuming from ACPI S3 >>> (or unloading and loading the `ath10k_core`/`ath10k_pci` modules) >>> having been connected to an AVM network: >>> >>> wlp58s0: failed to remove key (0, ce:ce:1e:27:bb:e0) from hardware= (-110) >>> >>> Error code 110 is the value for ETIMEDOUT. I saw James patch [1], and >>> applied it, and the error is still there (as expected). >>> >>> Can the warning be improved so the user know, which component is at fau= lt? >> The warning comes from mac80211 and it already contains your network >> interface name (wlp58s0). What else would you want to see? > > As an ignorant user, I do not know what to do with the warning. I=E2=80= =99d > like to see a suggestion how to get rid of the warning. Maybe: > > wlp58s0: failed to remove key (0, ce:ce:1e:27:bb:e0) from hardware > in X s (-110), please report it to the vendor firmware The warning can come due to different reasons in different drivers, it's not really easy to identify what the user should do. --=20 https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatc= hes