From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gonAO-0002YZ-ND for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 10:32:26 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: snoc: remove set but not used variable 'ar_snoc' References: <1536200965-121172-1-git-send-email-yuehaibing@huawei.com> <4b16caf3-9a25-99d0-5b35-f27d6e5a5c65@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 12:32:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Brian Norris's message of "Tue, 29 Jan 2019 10:12:42 -0800") Message-ID: <878sz2l9la.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Brian Norris Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, YueHaibing , ath10k@lists.infradead.org Brian Norris writes: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 9:53 PM YueHaibing wrote: >> >> ping... > > For some reason, your patch shows up as Deferred in patchwork: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10589789/ > > So the maintainers have accidentally (?) ignored it. Actually I put it deliberately to deferred as I wanted to apply Govind's QMI patches first and only then this. But unfortunately the deferred patches have been piled up by other patches so I haven't taken this patch yet. > I'm not what the official suggestion is for that, but you might just > resend. No need to resend, I can just change the state from Deferred to New. But I see that the patch was already resent so I'll drop this version now. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k