From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from m42-5.mailgun.net ([69.72.42.5]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kkWv3-0007Ak-Cg for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 18:32:02 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ath10k: Fix the parsing error in service available event References: <1605501291-23040-1-git-send-email-pillair@codeaurora.org> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 20:31:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Doug Anderson's message of "Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:26:07 -0800") Message-ID: <87a6uwhxes.fsf@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Doug Anderson Cc: Abhishek Kumar , Brian Norris , linux-wireless , LKML , ath10k , Rakesh Pillai Doug Anderson writes: > Hi, > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 8:35 PM Rakesh Pillai wrote: >> >> The wmi service available event has been >> extended to contain extra 128 bit for new services >> to be indicated by firmware. >> >> Currently the presence of any optional TLVs in >> the wmi service available event leads to a parsing >> error with the below error message: >> ath10k_snoc 18800000.wifi: failed to parse svc_avail tlv: -71 >> >> The wmi service available event parsing should >> not return error for the newly added optional TLV. >> Fix this parsing for service available event message. >> >> Tested-on: WCN3990 hw1.0 SNOC WLAN.HL.3.2.2-00720-QCAHLSWMTPL-1 >> >> Fixes: cea19a6ce8bf ("ath10k: add WMI_SERVICE_AVAILABLE_EVENT support") >> Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pillai >> --- >> Changes from v2: >> - Add code documentation explaining the necessity of variable >> initialization for the logic to work. >> --- >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi-tlv.c | 4 +++- >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c | 9 +++++++-- >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h | 1 + >> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > This looks nice to me now. I will let Kalle decide what to do about > the checkpatch issue that Abhishek found (ignore, fix himself, or > request another spin). Currently ath10k uses mixed of both comment styles and I have disabled that patchwork check in my ath10k-check script. I should finally try to unify that and make all ath10k comments to use the networking style, patches very welcome :) -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k