From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.72]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WIi5s-0007zz-NP for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:16:29 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: skip management frames in HTT path References: <1393311399-8070-1-git-send-email-janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:16:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1393311399-8070-1-git-send-email-janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> (Janusz Dziedzic's message of "Tue, 25 Feb 2014 07:56:39 +0100") Message-ID: <87a9ddlrqm.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Janusz Dziedzic Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org Janusz Dziedzic writes: > After we pass frames with INV_PEER to upper layer in patch: > > ath10k: pass frames with invalid peer status to upper layer > > we could pass some management frames (in case INVALID_PEER > and MGMT_CTRL) twice to upper layer, once via WMI and once > via HTT. Next we could handle assoc request twice. This > patch remove such regression. > > Signed-off-by: Janusz Dziedzic I saw a conflict and also did some commit log cleanup. Please check: https://github.com/kvalo/ath/commit/dd0063fba4434d22fb8a6e6d79bf23cc36f6916a -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k