From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: Eric Park <me@ericswpark.com>
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: QCA6174 showing terrible performance when connecting via WPA3-SAE
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 19:32:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bk5sqgdf.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <483bc3022513fd0740b5342b59ce94ad@ericswpark.com> (Eric Park's message of "Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:26:28 +0200")
Eric Park <me@ericswpark.com> writes:
> On 2024-04-29 14:18, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> If you run wpa_supplicant -dddt (or similar) you get a lot of debug
>> output, I'm sure it will also include the cipher.
>
> Good to know, thank you. Will keep this in mind the next time I'm
> troubleshooting WPA-levels.
>
>> Very good that you found this is 802.11w related. What is the make and
>> model of your router?
>
> I'm using a GL-AXT1800 (Slate AX) router from GL.iNet.
>
>> I don't know how well ath10k 802.11w support is tested and then it was
>> last tested. Do you happen to have other Access Points supporting
>> 802.11w? That might help to pinpoint if 802.11w is completely broken in
>> ath10k or if this is an interoperability issue with ath10k and your AP.
>
> I unfortunately do not have access to any other routers I can modify
> settings on at the moment (or any other APs to connect to, to test on,
> really...) I may have some routers to test it on next week, but I'm
> unsure whether they allow me to modify the 802.11w settings as they're
> mostly proprietary and don't run something like OpenWRT.
>
> Do you know if it'll be possible to add a flag to enable/disable 802.11w
> on ath10k's side? Even if it turns out to be an interoperability issue,
> it will most likely be useful to have the ability to switch it off for
> APs that don't play nice. Especially for public APs and proprietary
> APs where the end-user can't realistically turn off 802.11w for the
> entire network.
If the problem is on ath10k side I would rather semove support for
802.11w altogether (until it's fixed). It's controlled with this flag:
ieee80211_hw_set(ar->hw, MFP_CAPABLE);
Alternatively if it works on some hardware and not on others we could
make it per hw, for example disabled on QCA6174 and enabled on all
others.
But I found some old documentation claiming that 802.11w can be disabled
from Network Manager, if it works that sounds like a good temporary
solution:
"pmf int32 0 Indicates whether Protected Management Frames (802.11w)
must be enabled for the connection."
https://developer-old.gnome.org/NetworkManager/stable/settings-802-11-wireless-security.html
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-29 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-09 15:08 QCA6174 showing terrible performance when connecting via WPA3-SAE Eric Park
2024-03-11 10:21 ` Kalle Valo
2024-03-21 4:05 ` Eric Park
2024-04-25 9:51 ` Kalle Valo
2024-04-28 3:04 ` Eric Park
2024-04-29 12:18 ` Kalle Valo
2024-04-29 13:26 ` Eric Park
2024-04-29 16:32 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2024-04-29 17:53 ` Eric Park
2024-05-03 21:52 ` Eric Park
2024-05-06 9:04 ` Kalle Valo
2024-05-07 1:37 ` Eric Park
2024-05-14 15:27 ` Kalle Valo
2024-05-14 22:23 ` Eric Park
2024-05-15 8:04 ` Kalle Valo
2024-05-17 8:43 ` Eric Park
2024-05-17 9:41 ` Kalle Valo
2024-04-29 18:23 ` James Prestwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bk5sqgdf.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=me@ericswpark.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox