From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.72]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Ya41h-0002RZ-UV for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 15:12:27 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ath10k: fix rts profile for second rate series References: <1425451847-14505-1-git-send-email-rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:11:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1425451847-14505-1-git-send-email-rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> (Rajkumar Manoharan's message of "Wed, 4 Mar 2015 12:20:46 +0530") Message-ID: <87bnjjeojr.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Rajkumar Manoharan Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org Rajkumar Manoharan writes: > By default rts protection is enabled in firmware for the second > rateset. Currently ath10k selects RTS profile (only for software > retries), when legacy stations are associated or asked by mac80211. > On congested environment, when AP is running in HT/VHT mode and > there are no legacy clients associated, this will impact the > robustness. Also enabling RTS protection only for second rateset will > not impact performance on clear environment. Fix that. > > Signed-off-by: Rajkumar Manoharan Thanks, both patches applied. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k