From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i03AR-00027V-LC for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:23:18 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81B16C08E2BD for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id x40so4060380edm.4 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 05:23:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] ath10k: change max RX bundle size from 8 to 32 for sdio In-Reply-To: <1566302108-18219-3-git-send-email-wgong@codeaurora.org> References: <1566302108-18219-1-git-send-email-wgong@codeaurora.org> <1566302108-18219-3-git-send-email-wgong@codeaurora.org> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 14:23:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87ef1gt49d.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Wen Gong , ath10k@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Wen Gong writes: > The max bundle size support by firmware is 32, change it from 8 to 32 > will help performance. This results in significant performance > improvement on RX path. What happens when the hardware doesn't have enough data to fill a bundle? Does it send a smaller one, or does it wait until it can fill it? -Toke _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k