From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hL71R-0004YK-Qg for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 14:12:47 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Drop WARN_ON()s that always trigger during system resume References: <2884043.Jv1Mn93hE8@aspire.rjw.lan> <20190403195718.GA74723@google.com> <87o94tutdz.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:12:39 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Claire Chang's message of "Mon, 29 Apr 2019 18:41:50 +0800") Message-ID: <87ef5ksxwo.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Claire Chang Cc: Sriram R , Linux PM , Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu , "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS (WIRELESS)" , Brian Norris , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , ath10k@lists.infradead.org, Srinivas Pandruvada , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Todd Brandt Claire Chang writes: > Tested-by: Claire Chang > >> Still, I'm quite sure that the WARN_ON()s trigger during system resume >> regardless of the hw/fw combination. > > Also see this on sido: > > [ 4.925278] ath10k_sdio mmc1:0001:1: qca6174 hw3.2 sdio target > 0x05030000 chip_id 0x00000000 sub 0000:0000 > [ 4.935721] ath10k_sdio mmc1:0001:1: kconfig debug 1 debugfs 1 > tracing 1 dfs 0 testmode 1 > [ 4.948750] ath10k_sdio mmc1:0001:1: firmware ver > WLAN.RMH.4.4.1-00007-QCARMSWP-1 api 6 features wowlan,ignore-otp crc32 > b98adaf8 > [ 5.132728] ath10k_sdio mmc1:0001:1: board_file api 2 bmi_id 0:4 > crc32 6364cfcc Great, thanks. I added your Tested-by as well. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k