From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from sabertooth02.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.38]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VOMbR-0004nm-Kw for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 07:00:10 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [RFC] ath10k: replenish HTT RX buffers in a tasklet References: <1379509691-19904-1-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> <87r4cebuxm.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 09:59:38 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Michal Kazior's message of "Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:51:59 +0200") Message-ID: <87eh8ebt7p.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Michal Kazior Cc: linux-wireless , ath10k@lists.infradead.org Michal Kazior writes: > On 24 September 2013 08:22, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Michal Kazior writes: >> >>> This fixes system starvation when under heavy RX >>> traffic. This problem could be observed on AP135 >>> and led to watchdog resetting the platform. >>> >>> Patch starves FW RX ring buffer by progressively >>> replenishing buffers to auto-balance the RX >>> handled to the host system. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Michal Kazior >> >> Looks good to me. I suspect there is a better way to do this in long >> term, but this looks like a viable short term solution. >> >> Does it decrease throughput in a noticeable way? > > I have yet to observe any regressions. Good. If you think the patch should be applied please resend it as "[PATCH]" so that I can apply it. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k