From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h2C1R-0004jw-IZ for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 09:42:34 +0000 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: support PCIe enter L1 state References: <1542163848-837-1-git-send-email-wgong@codeaurora.org> <20181115002836.GA71934@google.com> <20181115184333.GA87504@google.com> <87va4x8q2c.fsf@codeaurora.org> <87y36q75wr.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 11:42:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Brian Norris's message of "Fri, 8 Feb 2019 09:05:11 -0800") Message-ID: <87h8cd8zy2.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Brian Norris Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82?= Kazior , linux-wireless , ath10k@lists.infradead.org, Wen Gong Brian Norris writes: > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:42 AM Kalle Valo wrote: >> No replies from anyone (including Wen) for 3 months about testing this >> patch on anything else than QCA6174. So I'll drop this now, please >> resubmit once test coverage is better. > > I know this isn't exactly what you're asking for, but FWIW we've been > using this since late November on all our QCA6174 products. No issues > seen as far as I know, and we have seen some power savings. Thanks for the feedback, this is very good to know. I also would like to apply this but not before we have some testing feedback from AP chipsets like QCA988X or QCA9984. Wen, are you planning to test those and resubmit? -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k