From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1abZ30-0003XZ-Lk for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 19:36:31 +0000 From: "Valo, Kalle" Subject: Re: Per radio configuration Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 19:36:04 +0000 Message-ID: <87io131hi8.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <56B3BCF0.7070408@candelatech.com> <877fhj3774.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <56D8694D.9040502@candelatech.com> <87y49z1mwj.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: (Jasmine Strong's message of "Thu, 3 Mar 2016 10:50:49 -0800") Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: <4C39C137BC08F5409B12B95046F1566D@qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Jasmine Strong Cc: Ben Greear , ath10k Jasmine Strong writes: > This seems like the sort of thing the flattened device tree was > intended to do. I'm no DT expert but isn't device tree supposed to only describe hardware properties? This is more like a software property, for example how to allocate memory on the firmware etc. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k